Linux MIPS Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
To: Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@gmail.com>
Cc: Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi>,
	David Daney <ddaney.cavm@gmail.com>,
	Faidon Liambotis <paravoid@debian.org>,
	Linux-MIPS <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: octeon: oops/panic with CONFIG_SERIO_I8042=y
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 00:49:17 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51E854CD.9070405@cogentembedded.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOLZvyENHhdo5B7ifmhYAciu6Z_aVRgA9FmjyvAcaaphRurQsA@mail.gmail.com>

On 07/19/2013 12:42 AM, Manuel Lauss wrote:

>> On 07/18/2013 11:34 PM, Manuel Lauss wrote:

>>>>>> My goal is to run a standard Debian kernel and its octeon variant[1] on
>>>>>> the Ubiquity EdgeRouter Lite. The ERLite needs a couple of patches
>>>>>> to boot and work (octeon-ethernet patch, octeon-usb driver) but these
>>>>>> are already merged 3.11 and I'll file Debian bugs to enable those
>>>>>> settings appropriately.

>>>>>> 1: e.g. http://packages.debian.org/sid/linux-image-3.10-1-octeon

>>>>>> However, when trying to boot a standard Debian kernel in the ERLite I
>>>>>> get a 7s delay followed by an oops for a Data bus error on
>>>>>> i8042_flush()
>>>>>> and ending up with a panic. It looks like the kernel is built with
>>>>>> CONFIG_SERIO_I8042=y.  The Octeon machine Debian owns prints "i8042: No
>>>>>> controller found" but works nevertheless.  This isn't the case with the
>>>>>> ERLite; I tried 3.2 & 3.10 and got the same oops which went away as
>>>>>> soon
>>>>>> as I disabled CONFIG_SERIO_I8042.

>>>>>> Are there even any octeon machines with i8042 anyway? Should I request
>>>>>> for the setting to be disabled irrespective of this bug?

>>>>> Yes.  There is a rare board called NAC38 that was produced by ASUS
>>>>> in a 1U chassis.  I don't think it is important to support this, so
>>>>> the best thing seems to be not to enable SERIO_I8042

>>>> I think the real bug here is that IO space does not get properly
>>>> initialized on Octeon when there is no PCI? So any drivers trying to
>>>> probe IO space will produce some interesting results.

>>> This is not specific to Octeon, I've seen it on Alchemy as well.  A lot of
>>> drivers, coming from x86, simply assume that x86-Port-IO space is
>>> always available without having to map it first.  I'd say it's a bug in
>>> the various drivers.

>>     Drivers don't have to map I/O space in any way, it's a complete nonsense.

> isn't that what ioport_map is for?

    ioport_map() permits to use ioread*()/iowrite*(). in*()/out*() don't need 
it. It's a job of the arch platform code to map I/O ports into specific memory 
range if true I/O space doesn't exist.

> Manuel

WBR, Sergei

  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-18 20:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-18 12:25 octeon: oops/panic with CONFIG_SERIO_I8042=y Faidon Liambotis
2013-07-18 16:28 ` David Daney
2013-07-18 18:03   ` Aaro Koskinen
2013-07-18 19:34     ` Manuel Lauss
2013-07-18 19:39       ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-07-18 20:42         ` Manuel Lauss
2013-07-18 20:49           ` Sergei Shtylyov [this message]
2013-07-18 20:55             ` David Daney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51E854CD.9070405@cogentembedded.com \
    --to=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
    --cc=aaro.koskinen@iki.fi \
    --cc=ddaney.cavm@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=manuel.lauss@gmail.com \
    --cc=paravoid@debian.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox