From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Thu, 26 Sep 2013 19:10:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from b.ns.miles-group.at ([95.130.255.144]:9061 "EHLO radon.swed.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S6831351Ab3IZRKjjxvtD (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Sep 2013 19:10:39 +0200 Received: (qmail 23762 invoked by uid 89); 26 Sep 2013 17:10:42 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 23695, pid: 23759, t: 0.0585s scanners: attach: 1.3.1 clamav: 0.96.5/m: Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.11?) (richard@nod.at@212.186.22.124) by radon.swed.at with ESMTPA; 26 Sep 2013 17:10:42 -0000 Message-ID: <52446A89.1080409@nod.at> Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 19:10:33 +0200 From: Richard Weinberger User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ramkumar Ramachandra CC: Geert Uytterhoeven , Linux-Arch , Michal Marek , Ralf Baechle , Paul Mundt , Jeff Dike , Guan Xuetao , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , the arch/x86 maintainers , linux-kbuild , LKML , linux-m68k , Linux MIPS Mailing List , Linux-sh list , uml-devel Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] um: Do not use SUBARCH References: <1377073172-3662-1-git-send-email-richard@nod.at> <1377073172-3662-3-git-send-email-richard@nod.at> <52441025.9030308@nod.at> <52441407.9010603@nod.at> <52442108.1020304@nod.at> <524443AC.3040409@nod.at> <52444CED.40401@nod.at> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 38001 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: richard@nod.at Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: linux-mips X-List-ID: linux-mips List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-mips Am 26.09.2013 18:06, schrieb Ramkumar Ramachandra: > Richard Weinberger wrote: >> And, of course, this makes your patch valid. >> Can you also please ensure that your new defconfigs are minimal? > > Yeah, it's close to a minimal configuration for the 3.10 kernel > (latest at the time of patch submission). I was aiming to minimize the > diff between the current defconfig and the two new defconfigs in > configs/. The slim diffstat does the talking: > > arch/um/Kconfig.common | 5 - > arch/um/Makefile | 11 ++ > arch/um/{defconfig => configs/i386_defconfig} | 209 +++++++++++++------- > arch/um/{defconfig => configs/x86_64_defconfig} | 250 +++++++++++++++--------- > arch/x86/um/Kconfig | 5 + > 5 files changed, 306 insertions(+), 174 deletions(-) > copy arch/um/{defconfig => configs/i386_defconfig} (86%) > rename arch/um/{defconfig => configs/x86_64_defconfig} (83%) > > If we find some deficiencies, we can always update it. For now, please > commit these two patches. Please resend them with savedefconfig applied. There is no need to have three commits for that. Thanks, //richard