From: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
To: "Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] bcma: gpio: add own IRQ domain
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 19:37:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5298DED7.90708@hauke-m.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1385747290-22575-1-git-send-email-zajec5@gmail.com>
On 11/29/2013 06:48 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> Input GPIO changes can generate interrupts, but we need kind of ACK for
> them by changing IRQ polarity. This is required to stop hardware from
> keep generating interrupts and generate another one on the next GPIO
> state change.
> This code allows using GPIOs with standard interrupts and add for
> example GPIO buttons support.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
> ---
> V3: Apply Hauke's comments.
> 1) Use IRQ domain for CONFIG_BCMA_HOST_SOC only
> 2) Optimize bcma_gpio_irq_handler
> 3) Register GPIO chip after doing everything else
> 4) Improve cleaning paths
> ---
> drivers/bcma/Kconfig | 1 +
> drivers/bcma/driver_gpio.c | 126 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> include/linux/bcma/bcma_driver_chipcommon.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 126 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/bcma/Kconfig b/drivers/bcma/Kconfig
> index 7c081b3..0ee48be 100644
> --- a/drivers/bcma/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/bcma/Kconfig
> @@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ config BCMA_DRIVER_GMAC_CMN
> config BCMA_DRIVER_GPIO
> bool "BCMA GPIO driver"
> depends on BCMA && GPIOLIB
> + select IRQ_DOMAIN if BCMA_HOST_SOC
> help
> Driver to provide access to the GPIO pins of the bcma bus.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/bcma/driver_gpio.c b/drivers/bcma/driver_gpio.c
> index 45f0996..fe9b1bc 100644
> --- a/drivers/bcma/driver_gpio.c
> +++ b/drivers/bcma/driver_gpio.c
> @@ -9,6 +9,9 @@
> */
>
> #include <linux/gpio.h>
> +#include <linux/irq.h>
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> +#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
> #include <linux/export.h>
> #include <linux/bcma/bcma.h>
>
> @@ -73,19 +76,117 @@ static void bcma_gpio_free(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned gpio)
> bcma_chipco_gpio_pullup(cc, 1 << gpio, 0);
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_BCMA_HOST_SOC
> static int bcma_gpio_to_irq(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned gpio)
> {
> struct bcma_drv_cc *cc = bcma_gpio_get_cc(chip);
>
> if (cc->core->bus->hosttype == BCMA_HOSTTYPE_SOC)
> - return bcma_core_irq(cc->core);
> + return irq_find_mapping(cc->irq_domain, gpio);
> else
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> +static void bcma_gpio_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> + struct bcma_drv_cc *cc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> + int gpio = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
> +
> + bcma_chipco_gpio_intmask(cc, BIT(gpio), BIT(gpio));
> +}
> +
> +static void bcma_gpio_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> + struct bcma_drv_cc *cc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> + int gpio = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
> +
> + bcma_chipco_gpio_intmask(cc, BIT(gpio), 0);
> +}
> +
> +static struct irq_chip bcma_gpio_irq_chip = {
> + .name = "BCMA-GPIO",
> + .irq_mask = bcma_gpio_irq_mask,
> + .irq_unmask = bcma_gpio_irq_unmask,
> +};
> +
> +static irqreturn_t bcma_gpio_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
> +{
> + struct bcma_drv_cc *cc = dev_id;
> + u32 val = bcma_cc_read32(cc, BCMA_CC_GPIOIN);
> + u32 mask = bcma_cc_read32(cc, BCMA_CC_GPIOIRQ);
> + u32 pol = bcma_cc_read32(cc, BCMA_CC_GPIOPOL);
> + u32 irqs = (val ^ pol) & mask;
> + u32 pol_mask = 0, pol_val = 0;
> + int gpio;
> +
> + for_each_set_bit(gpio, (unsigned long *)&irqs, cc->gpio.ngpio) {
> + generic_handle_irq(bcma_gpio_to_irq(&cc->gpio, gpio));
> + pol_mask |= BIT(gpio);
> + if (val & BIT(gpio))
> + pol_val |= BIT(gpio);
> + }
Instead of calculation pol_mask and pol_val bit for bit manually, you
can pretty easy calculate valid value like this:
pol_mask = irqs;
pol_val = val & irqs;
> + bcma_chipco_gpio_polarity(cc, pol_mask, pol_val);
> +
> + return irqs ? IRQ_HANDLED : IRQ_NONE;
> +}
> +
> +static int bcma_gpio_irq_domain_init(struct bcma_drv_cc *cc)
> +{
> + struct gpio_chip *chip = &cc->gpio;
> + int gpio, hwirq, err;
> +
> + cc->irq_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(NULL, chip->ngpio,
> + &irq_domain_simple_ops, cc);
> + if (!cc->irq_domain) {
> + err = -ENODEV;
> + goto err_irq_domain;
> + }
> + for (gpio = 0; gpio < chip->ngpio; gpio++) {
> + int irq = irq_create_mapping(cc->irq_domain, gpio);
> +
> + irq_set_chip_data(irq, cc);
> + irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &bcma_gpio_irq_chip,
> + handle_simple_irq);
> + }
> +
> + hwirq = bcma_core_irq(cc->core);
> + err = request_irq(hwirq, bcma_gpio_irq_handler, IRQF_SHARED, "gpio",
> + cc);
> + if (err)
> + goto err_req_irq;
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +err_req_irq:
> + for (gpio = 0; gpio < chip->ngpio; gpio++) {
> + int irq = irq_find_mapping(cc->irq_domain, gpio);
> +
> + irq_dispose_mapping(irq);
> + }
> + irq_domain_remove(cc->irq_domain);
> +err_irq_domain:
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> +static void bcma_gpio_irq_domain_exit(struct bcma_drv_cc *cc)
> +{
> + struct gpio_chip *chip = &cc->gpio;
> + int gpio;
> +
> + free_irq(bcma_core_irq(cc->core), cc);
> + for (gpio = 0; gpio < chip->ngpio; gpio++) {
> + int irq = irq_find_mapping(cc->irq_domain, gpio);
> +
> + irq_dispose_mapping(irq);
> + }
> + irq_domain_remove(cc->irq_domain);
> +}
> +#endif
I do not like all these ifdefs, why not add this and remove some of them
from the code in bcma_gpio_init():
#else /* CONFIG_BCMA_HOST_SOC */
static int bcma_gpio_irq_domain_init(struct bcma_drv_cc *cc)
{
return 0;
}
static void bcma_gpio_irq_domain_exit(struct bcma_drv_cc *cc)
{
/* Nothing */
}
#endif /* CONFIG_BCMA_HOST_SOC */
> +
> int bcma_gpio_init(struct bcma_drv_cc *cc)
> {
> struct gpio_chip *chip = &cc->gpio;
> + int err;
>
> chip->label = "bcma_gpio";
> chip->owner = THIS_MODULE;
> @@ -95,7 +196,9 @@ int bcma_gpio_init(struct bcma_drv_cc *cc)
> chip->set = bcma_gpio_set_value;
> chip->direction_input = bcma_gpio_direction_input;
> chip->direction_output = bcma_gpio_direction_output;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_BCMA_HOST_SOC
> chip->to_irq = bcma_gpio_to_irq;
> +#endif
> chip->ngpio = 16;
> /* There is just one SoC in one device and its GPIO addresses should be
> * deterministic to address them more easily. The other buses could get
> @@ -105,10 +208,29 @@ int bcma_gpio_init(struct bcma_drv_cc *cc)
> else
> chip->base = -1;
>
> - return gpiochip_add(chip);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_BCMA_HOST_SOC
> + err = bcma_gpio_irq_domain_init(cc);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +#endif
> +
> + err = gpiochip_add(chip);
> + if (err) {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_BCMA_HOST_SOC
> + bcma_gpio_irq_domain_exit(cc);
> +#endif
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> + bcma_cc_set32(cc, BCMA_CC_IRQMASK, BCMA_CC_IRQ_GPIO);
This should be moved into bcma_gpio_irq_domain_ini(), I do not know what
happens when we activate them on a PCIe device. IRQs should get
deactivated in bcma_gpio_irq_domain_exit().
> +
> + return 0;
> }
>
> int bcma_gpio_unregister(struct bcma_drv_cc *cc)
> {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_BCMA_HOST_SOC
> + bcma_gpio_irq_domain_exit(cc);
> +#endif
> return gpiochip_remove(&cc->gpio);
> }
> diff --git a/include/linux/bcma/bcma_driver_chipcommon.h b/include/linux/bcma/bcma_driver_chipcommon.h
> index c49e1a1..63d105c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bcma/bcma_driver_chipcommon.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bcma/bcma_driver_chipcommon.h
> @@ -640,6 +640,7 @@ struct bcma_drv_cc {
> spinlock_t gpio_lock;
> #ifdef CONFIG_BCMA_DRIVER_GPIO
> struct gpio_chip gpio;
> + struct irq_domain *irq_domain;
> #endif
> };
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-29 18:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-29 16:09 [PATCH V2 1/2] bcma: gpio: add own IRQ domain Rafał Miłecki
2013-11-29 16:09 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] MIPS: BCM47XX: Prepare support for GPIO buttons Rafał Miłecki
2013-12-09 13:33 ` Hauke Mehrtens
2013-12-10 15:24 ` [PATCH V3 " Rafał Miłecki
2013-12-11 21:56 ` Hauke Mehrtens
2014-01-02 12:31 ` [PATCH V4] " Rafał Miłecki
2013-11-29 16:31 ` [PATCH V2 1/2] bcma: gpio: add own IRQ domain Hauke Mehrtens
2013-11-29 16:55 ` Rafał Miłecki
2013-11-29 17:48 ` [PATCH V3 " Rafał Miłecki
2013-11-29 18:37 ` Hauke Mehrtens [this message]
2013-11-29 19:12 ` [PATCH V4 " Rafał Miłecki
2013-11-29 20:37 ` John Crispin
2013-11-29 20:53 ` Rafał Miłecki
2013-11-29 21:16 ` John Crispin
2013-12-08 18:10 ` Hauke Mehrtens
2013-12-08 19:24 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-12-10 11:56 ` [PATCH V5 " Rafał Miłecki
2013-12-11 21:53 ` Hauke Mehrtens
2013-12-12 12:42 ` [PATCH V6 " Rafał Miłecki
2013-12-12 12:46 ` [PATCH V7 " Rafał Miłecki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5298DED7.90708@hauke-m.de \
--to=hauke@hauke-m.de \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=zajec5@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox