From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Mon, 28 Jul 2014 20:01:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:38615 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S6861307AbaG1R7713ZGi (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2014 19:59:59 +0200 Received: from tazenda.hos.anvin.org ([IPv6:2601:9:7280:900:3408:aaff:fe41:adba]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.zytor.com (8.14.7/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s6SHxoJd002301 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 28 Jul 2014 10:59:50 -0700 Message-ID: <53D68F91.4000106@zytor.com> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 10:59:45 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andy Lutomirski , Kees Cook CC: LKML , Will Drewry , Oleg Nesterov , "x86@kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Linux MIPS Mailing List , linux-arch , linux-security-module , Alexei Starovoitov Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] Two-phase seccomp and x86 tracing changes References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 41714 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: hpa@zytor.com Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: linux-mips X-List-ID: linux-mips List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-mips On 07/23/2014 12:20 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > It looks like patches 1-4 have landed here: > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/kees/linux.git/log/?h=seccomp/fastpath > > hpa, what's the route forward for the x86 part? > I guess I should discuss this with Kees to figure out what makes most sense. In the meantime, could you address Oleg's question? -hpa From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:38615 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S6861307AbaG1R7713ZGi (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2014 19:59:59 +0200 Message-ID: <53D68F91.4000106@zytor.com> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 10:59:45 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] Two-phase seccomp and x86 tracing changes References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-Path: Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: To: Andy Lutomirski , Kees Cook Cc: LKML , Will Drewry , Oleg Nesterov , "x86@kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Linux MIPS Mailing List , linux-arch , linux-security-module , Alexei Starovoitov Message-ID: <20140728175945.8TwI2JR75ewfTehN6YIfFahuQI_dAru3c-yrM3c3DMg@z> On 07/23/2014 12:20 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > It looks like patches 1-4 have landed here: > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/kees/linux.git/log/?h=seccomp/fastpath > > hpa, what's the route forward for the x86 part? > I guess I should discuss this with Kees to figure out what makes most sense. In the meantime, could you address Oleg's question? -hpa