From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Tue, 29 Jul 2014 02:48:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:41587 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S6861504AbaG1XpMfgo3u (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jul 2014 01:45:12 +0200 Received: from tazenda.hos.anvin.org ([IPv6:2601:9:7280:900:3408:aaff:fe41:adba]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.zytor.com (8.14.7/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s6SNj8fm024617 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 28 Jul 2014 16:45:08 -0700 Message-ID: <53D6E07F.7090806@zytor.com> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 16:45:03 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kees Cook CC: linux-arch , Linux MIPS Mailing List , Will Drewry , "x86@kernel.org" , LKML , Andy Lutomirski , linux-security-module , Oleg Nesterov , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Alexei Starovoitov Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] Two-phase seccomp and x86 tracing changes References: <53D68F91.4000106@zytor.com> <53D6DE1E.1060501@zytor.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 41737 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: hpa@zytor.com Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: linux-mips X-List-ID: linux-mips List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-mips On 07/28/2014 04:42 PM, Kees Cook wrote: > On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 4:34 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> On 07/28/2014 04:29 PM, Kees Cook wrote: >>> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 10:59 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >>>> On 07/23/2014 12:20 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >>>>> >>>>> It looks like patches 1-4 have landed here: >>>>> >>>>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/kees/linux.git/log/?h=seccomp/fastpath >>>>> >>>>> hpa, what's the route forward for the x86 part? >>>>> >>>> >>>> I guess I should discuss this with Kees to figure out what makes most >>>> sense. In the meantime, could you address Oleg's question? >>> >>> Since the x86 parts depend on the seccomp parts, I'm happy if you >>> carry them instead of having them land from my tree. Otherwise I'm >>> open to how to coordinate timing. >>> >> >> You mean for me to carry the seccomp part as well? > > If that makes sense as far as the coordination, that's fine with me. > Otherwise I'm not sure how x86 can build without having the seccomp > changes in your tree. > Exactly. What I guess I'll do is set up a separate tip branch for this, pull your branch into it, and then put the x86 patches on top. Does that make sense for everyone? -hpa From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:41587 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S6861504AbaG1XpMfgo3u (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jul 2014 01:45:12 +0200 Message-ID: <53D6E07F.7090806@zytor.com> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 16:45:03 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] Two-phase seccomp and x86 tracing changes References: <53D68F91.4000106@zytor.com> <53D6DE1E.1060501@zytor.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-Path: Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: To: Kees Cook Cc: linux-arch , Linux MIPS Mailing List , Will Drewry , "x86@kernel.org" , LKML , Andy Lutomirski , linux-security-module , Oleg Nesterov , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Alexei Starovoitov Message-ID: <20140728234503.xERRO8IM9atDa4y2DjUB6LS_Ejg8vI3KAX9vX4hSa3Y@z> On 07/28/2014 04:42 PM, Kees Cook wrote: > On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 4:34 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> On 07/28/2014 04:29 PM, Kees Cook wrote: >>> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 10:59 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >>>> On 07/23/2014 12:20 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >>>>> >>>>> It looks like patches 1-4 have landed here: >>>>> >>>>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/kees/linux.git/log/?h=seccomp/fastpath >>>>> >>>>> hpa, what's the route forward for the x86 part? >>>>> >>>> >>>> I guess I should discuss this with Kees to figure out what makes most >>>> sense. In the meantime, could you address Oleg's question? >>> >>> Since the x86 parts depend on the seccomp parts, I'm happy if you >>> carry them instead of having them land from my tree. Otherwise I'm >>> open to how to coordinate timing. >>> >> >> You mean for me to carry the seccomp part as well? > > If that makes sense as far as the coordination, that's fine with me. > Otherwise I'm not sure how x86 can build without having the seccomp > changes in your tree. > Exactly. What I guess I'll do is set up a separate tip branch for this, pull your branch into it, and then put the x86 patches on top. Does that make sense for everyone? -hpa