From: Joshua Kinard <kumba@gentoo.org>
To: Linux MIPS List <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
Subject: IP30: SMP, Almost there?
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 01:39:45 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55597B21.4010704@gentoo.org> (raw)
So I've gotten the second CPU in Octane to "tick" again...somehow. I am
certain someone's cat went missing in the process...
Anyways, it's booting into an initramfs and dying almost immediately with
errors from do_page_fault:
[ 15.631359] do_page_fault(): sending SIGSEGV to init for invalid write
access to 0000000000000338
[ 15.631395] epc = 0000000000478474 in busybox[400000+110000]
[ 15.631408] ra = 000000000047843c in busybox[400000+110000]
Segmentation fau[ 17.399304] Instruction bus error, epc == 000000000041c000,
ra == 000000000041c5c8
lt
[ 17.442702] Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init!
exitcode=0x0000000a
[ 17.442702]
[ 17.470272] ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init!
exitcode=0x0000000a
So after some digging around, I found this thread from way back in 2006 that
seems almost identical:
http://www.linux-mips.org/archives/linux-mips/2006-09/msg00169.html
However, none of the stuff regarding flush_icache_range seems to be around nor
relevant anymore. But I did comment out one of the #if 0's in
arch/mips/mm/fault.c and got this output:
[ 16.755572] Cpu0[init:1:0000000000520378:1:a800000020360bfc]
[ 16.772869] Cpu0[init:1:000000007ff45fb0:1:a80000002001cec4]
[ 16.790102] Cpu0[init:1:0000000000400160:0:0000000000400160]
[ 16.807563] Cpu0[init:1:000000000041c000:0:000000000041c000]
[ 16.825027] Cpu0[init:1:0000000000521ff8:1:0000000000402380]
[ 16.842141] Cpu0[init:1:0000000000522010:1:00000000004023d8]
[ 16.859289] Cpu0[init:1:0000000000422a6c:0:0000000000422a6c]
[ 16.876768] Cpu0[init:1:000000000051fffc:0:0000000000400320]
[ 16.893915] Cpu0[init:1:00000000004ddaf4:0:00000000004ddaf4]
[ 16.911389] Cpu0[init:1:000000000094d008:1:000000000040519c]
[ 16.928527] Cpu0[init:1:00000000004e7d9b:0:0000000000404aec]
[ 16.946000] Cpu0[init:1:0000000000503cde:0:0000000000428994]
[ 16.963441] Cpu0[init:1:000000000047f2d4:0:000000000047f2d4]
[ 16.980945] Cpu0[init:1:00000000004f76e8:0:000000000047f380]
[ 16.998410] Cpu0[init:1:000000000094eff8:1:00000000004051a0]
[ 17.015596] Cpu0[init:1:000000007ff449c8:0:a80000002001d668]
[ 17.032716] Cpu0[init:1:000000007ff449d0:1:a800000020360a48]
[ 17.050655] Cpu0[init:1:000000000094fff8:1:00000000004051a0]
[ 17.068127] Cpu0[init:1:0000000000950ff8:1:00000000004051a0]
[ 17.085615] Cpu0[init:1:0000000000952ff8:1:00000000004051a0]
[ 17.102741] Cpu0[init:1:0000000000951000:1:0000000000472fc8]
[ 17.121391] Cpu0[init:1:0000000000953ff8:1:00000000004051a0]
[ 17.138756] Cpu0[init:1:0000000000954ff8:1:00000000004051a0]
[ 17.156542] Cpu0[init:1:000000007ff44de8:1:0000000000403398]
[ 15.613954] Cpu1[init:75:000000000040c1a0:0:000000000040c1a0]
[ 15.614065] Cpu1[init:75:000000007ff44de8:1:0000000000403398]
[ 15.631203] Cpu1[init:75:0000000000413b58:0:0000000000413b58]
[ 15.631276] Cpu1[init:75:000000000047843c:0:000000000047843c]
[ 15.631336] Cpu1[init:75:0000000000000338:1:0000000000478474]
The invalid address (I believe what is effectively a NULL) of
0x0000000000000338 is pretty consistent with the netboot. Sometimes I get a
panic in a mutex*slowpath function (I forget which one). But it's way more
predictable with this netboot than with the disks inserted.
Any ideas where to start looking?
--J
next reply other threads:[~2015-05-18 5:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-18 5:39 Joshua Kinard [this message]
2015-05-18 12:01 ` IP30: SMP, Almost there? Joshua Kinard
2015-05-20 5:23 ` Joshua Kinard
2015-05-21 6:00 ` Joshua Kinard
2015-05-22 12:01 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2015-05-22 17:11 ` Ralf Baechle
2015-05-23 22:52 ` Joshua Kinard
2015-05-24 14:25 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2015-05-22 16:38 ` Ralf Baechle
2015-05-23 22:57 ` Joshua Kinard
2015-05-22 16:25 ` Ralf Baechle
2015-05-24 3:17 ` Joshua Kinard
2015-06-01 5:08 ` Joshua Kinard
2015-06-01 6:00 ` IP30: SMP, Almost there! Joshua Kinard
2015-06-01 19:32 ` IP30: SMP, Almost there? Ralf Baechle
2015-06-02 5:31 ` Joshua Kinard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55597B21.4010704@gentoo.org \
--to=kumba@gentoo.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox