From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Tue, 14 Mar 2017 23:29:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from www62.your-server.de ([213.133.104.62]:57411 "EHLO www62.your-server.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S23991232AbdCNW33zID9u (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Mar 2017 23:29:29 +0100 Received: from [188.62.51.164] (helo=localhost.localdomain) by www62.your-server.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.85_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cnuwW-00014s-CU; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 23:29:24 +0100 Message-ID: <58C86EC3.9010406@iogearbox.net> Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 23:29:23 +0100 From: Daniel Borkmann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Daney , linux-mips@linux-mips.org, ralf@linux-mips.org, James Hogan , Alexei Starovoitov , netdev@vger.kernel.org CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Steven J. Hill" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] MIPS: BPF: JIT fixes and improvements. References: <20170314212144.29988-1-david.daney@cavium.com> In-Reply-To: <20170314212144.29988-1-david.daney@cavium.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated-Sender: daniel@iogearbox.net X-Virus-Scanned: Clear (ClamAV 0.99.2/23204/Tue Mar 14 21:16:16 2017) Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 57268 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: daniel@iogearbox.net Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: linux-mips X-List-ID: linux-mips List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-mips On 03/14/2017 10:21 PM, David Daney wrote: > Changes from v1: > > - Use unsigned access for SKF_AD_HATYPE > > - Added three more patches for other problems found. > > > Testing the BPF JIT on Cavium OCTEON (mips64) with the test-bpf module > identified some failures and unimplemented features. Nice, thanks for working on this! If you see specific test cases for the JIT missing, please also feel free to extend the test_bpf suite, so this gets exposed further to other JITs, too. > With this patch set we get: > > test_bpf: Summary: 305 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [85/297 JIT'ed] > > Both big and little endian tested. > > We still lack eBPF support, but this is better than nothing. Any future plans on this one? Thanks, Daniel