From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Tue, 31 May 2005 17:30:57 +0100 (BST) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com ([IPv6:::ffff:64.233.162.195]:23606 "EHLO zproxy.gmail.com") by linux-mips.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Tue, 31 May 2005 17:30:43 +0100 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 13so3025799nzp for ; Tue, 31 May 2005 09:30:36 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=tc//QyzF5EgCmdS0798yp8Jbo8/IDArlgdvg0FvuH1yGZK7m09W/rQrtmq0Fju1UOBk8q/QkV1HdhQxnuiJoOyhT4k0N8HbDX4J/RocFVko7ndCj9dMT+Ya2HwnyAFqVFClcmv1eeqs8I4kArGKiYlXZtbOuF5TO0TXvHnGH6lU= Received: by 10.36.2.16 with SMTP id 16mr2386171nzb; Tue, 31 May 2005 09:30:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.68.6 with HTTP; Tue, 31 May 2005 09:30:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <6097c4905053109307edb80a6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 20:30:35 +0400 From: Maxim Osipov Reply-To: maxim@mox.ru To: macro@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: glibc-2.3.4 mips64 compilation failure Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, dan@debian.org In-Reply-To: <429C8F71.6080606@siemens.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <429C8F71.6080606@siemens.com> Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 8035 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: maxim.osipov@gmail.com Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips Yes, thanks - I'm already using it, for glibc it did help with my problem. Binutils 2.16 and gcc 3.4.3 seems to compile out of box (wo any patches), but I didn't try produced code on a hardware yet. Best regards, Maxim On 5/31/05, Maxim Osipov wrote: > > Do anyone have a clue what is happening? AFAIK, some people already > > had success building glibc for mips64. Probably I miss something? > > Please feel free to have a look at packages available at my site -- the > setup may seem a little bit odd (n64 is used as the default format and > actually the only one supported), but if you are after general setup, > patches, etc. it is still relevant; just ignore the odd stuff. Binary > packages have been built with GCC 4.0.0, so probably the sources + patches > are going to work with older tools as well. You may consider using > binutils 2.16, though (in general, not to solve your particular problem). > > Maciej >