From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
maciej.szmigiero@oracle.com,
"moderated list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR ARM64 (KVM/arm64)"
<kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>,
"open list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR MIPS (KVM/mips)"
<linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR MIPS (KVM/mips)"
<kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR RISC-V (KVM/riscv)"
<kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
Peter Feiner <pfeiner@google.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 13/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Allow NULL @vcpu in kvm_mmu_find_shadow_page()
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 16:26:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <75f7f353-3cb1-8d0f-1148-8a916bf575a3@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YqydjxjnuaYTIYMt@google.com>
On 6/17/22 17:28, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2022, David Matlack wrote:
>> Allow @vcpu to be NULL in kvm_mmu_find_shadow_page() (and its only
>> caller __kvm_mmu_get_shadow_page()). @vcpu is only required to sync
>> indirect shadow pages, so it's safe to pass in NULL when looking up
>> direct shadow pages.
>>
>> This will be used for doing eager page splitting, which allocates direct
>
> "hugepage" again, because I need constant reminders :-)
>
>> shadow pages from the context of a VM ioctl without access to a vCPU
>> pointer.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
>> ---
>
> With nits addressed,
>
> Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
>
>> arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 13 +++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
>> index 4fbc2da47428..acb54d6e0ea5 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
>> @@ -1850,6 +1850,7 @@ static int kvm_sync_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
>>
>> if (ret < 0)
>> kvm_mmu_prepare_zap_page(vcpu->kvm, sp, invalid_list);
>> +
>
> Unrelated whitespace change leftover from the previous approach.
>
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -2001,6 +2002,7 @@ static void clear_sp_write_flooding_count(u64 *spte)
>> __clear_sp_write_flooding_count(sptep_to_sp(spte));
>> }
>>
>> +/* Note, @vcpu may be NULL if @role.direct is true. */
>> static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_find_shadow_page(struct kvm *kvm,
>> struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> gfn_t gfn,
>> @@ -2039,6 +2041,16 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_find_shadow_page(struct kvm *kvm,
>> goto out;
>>
>> if (sp->unsync) {
>> + /*
>> + * A vCPU pointer should always be provided when finding
>
> s/should/must, and "be provided" in unnecessarily ambiguous, simply state that
> "@vcpu must be non-NULL". E.g. if a caller provides a pointer, but that pointer
> happens to be NULL.
>
>> + * indirect shadow pages, as that shadow page may
>> + * already exist and need to be synced using the vCPU
>> + * pointer. Direct shadow pages are never unsync and
>> + * thus do not require a vCPU pointer.
>> + */
>
> "vCPU pointer" over and over is a bit versbose, and I prefer to refer to vCPUs/VMs
> as objects themselves. E.g. "XYZ requires a vCPU" versus "XYZ requires a vCPU
> pointer" since it's not the pointer itself that's required, it's all the context
> of the vCPU that is needed.
>
> /*
> * @vcpu must be non-NULL when finding indirect shadow
> * pages, as such pages may already exist and need to
> * be synced, which requires a vCPU. Direct pages are
> * never unsync and thus do not require a vCPU.
> */
My own take:
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index d7987420bb26..a7748c5a2385 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -1975,7 +1975,12 @@ static void clear_sp_write_flooding_count(u64 *spte)
__clear_sp_write_flooding_count(sptep_to_sp(spte));
}
-/* Note, @vcpu may be NULL if @role.direct is true. */
+/*
+ * The vCPU is required when finding indirect shadow pages; the shadow
+ * page may already exist and syncing it needs the vCPU pointer in
+ * order to read guest page tables. Direct shadow pages are never
+ * unsync, thus @vcpu can be NULL if @role.direct is true.
+ */
static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_find_shadow_page(struct kvm *kvm,
struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
gfn_t gfn,
@@ -2014,13 +2019,6 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_find_shadow_page(struct kvm *kvm,
goto out;
if (sp->unsync) {
- /*
- * The vCPU pointer is required when finding indirect
- * shadow pages, as that shadow page may already exist
- * exist and need to be synced using the vCPU pointer.
- * Direct shadow pages are never unsync and thus do not
- * require a vCPU pointer.
- */
if (KVM_BUG_ON(!vcpu, kvm))
break;
@@ -2101,7 +2099,7 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_alloc_shadow_page(struct kvm *kvm,
return sp;
}
-/* Note, @vcpu may be NULL if @role.direct is true. */
+/* Note, @vcpu may be NULL if @role.direct is true; see kvm_mmu_find_shadow_page. */
static struct kvm_mmu_page *__kvm_mmu_get_shadow_page(struct kvm *kvm,
struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
struct shadow_page_caches *caches,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-22 14:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-16 23:21 [PATCH v6 00/22] KVM: Extend Eager Page Splitting to the shadow MMU David Matlack
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 01/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Optimize MMU page cache lookup for all direct SPs David Matlack
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 02/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Use a bool for direct David Matlack
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 03/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Stop passing @direct to mmu_alloc_root() David Matlack
2022-06-16 18:47 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-22 14:06 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-06-22 14:19 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 04/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Derive shadow MMU page role from parent David Matlack
2022-06-17 1:19 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-17 15:12 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 05/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Always pass 0 for @quadrant when gptes are 8 bytes David Matlack
2022-06-17 15:20 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 06/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Decompose kvm_mmu_get_page() into separate functions David Matlack
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 07/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Consolidate shadow page allocation and initialization David Matlack
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 08/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Rename shadow MMU functions that deal with shadow pages David Matlack
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 09/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Move guest PT write-protection to account_shadowed() David Matlack
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 10/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Pass memory caches to allocate SPs separately David Matlack
2022-06-17 15:01 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-21 17:06 ` David Matlack
2022-06-21 17:27 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 11/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Replace vcpu with kvm in kvm_mmu_alloc_shadow_page() David Matlack
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 12/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Pass kvm pointer separately from vcpu to kvm_mmu_find_shadow_page() David Matlack
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 13/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Allow NULL @vcpu in kvm_mmu_find_shadow_page() David Matlack
2022-06-17 15:28 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-22 14:26 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 14/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Pass const memslot to rmap_add() David Matlack
2022-06-17 15:30 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 15/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Decouple rmap_add() and link_shadow_page() from kvm_vcpu David Matlack
2022-06-17 16:39 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 16/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Update page stats in __rmap_add() David Matlack
2022-06-17 16:40 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 17/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Cache the access bits of shadowed translations David Matlack
2022-06-17 16:53 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 18/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Extend make_huge_page_split_spte() for the shadow MMU David Matlack
2022-06-17 16:56 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 19/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Zap collapsible SPTEs in shadow MMU at all possible levels David Matlack
2022-06-17 17:01 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-21 17:24 ` David Matlack
2022-06-21 17:59 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 20/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Refactor drop_large_spte() David Matlack
2022-06-17 17:11 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-22 16:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-06-22 16:50 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 21/22] KVM: Allow for different capacities in kvm_mmu_memory_cache structs David Matlack
2022-05-19 15:33 ` Anup Patel
2022-05-20 23:21 ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-05-23 17:37 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-23 17:44 ` David Matlack
2022-05-23 18:13 ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-05-23 18:22 ` David Matlack
2022-05-23 23:53 ` David Matlack
2022-06-17 17:41 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-17 18:34 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 22/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Extend Eager Page Splitting to nested MMUs David Matlack
2022-06-01 21:50 ` Ricardo Koller
2022-06-17 19:08 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=75f7f353-3cb1-8d0f-1148-8a916bf575a3@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=bgardon@google.com \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.szmigiero@oracle.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=pfeiner@google.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).