linux-mips.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
	Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
	Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
	Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
	maciej.szmigiero@oracle.com,
	"moderated list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR ARM64 (KVM/arm64)" 
	<kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>,
	"open list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR MIPS (KVM/mips)" 
	<linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR MIPS (KVM/mips)" 
	<kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR RISC-V (KVM/riscv)" 
	<kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
	Peter Feiner <pfeiner@google.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 13/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Allow NULL @vcpu in kvm_mmu_find_shadow_page()
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 16:26:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <75f7f353-3cb1-8d0f-1148-8a916bf575a3@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YqydjxjnuaYTIYMt@google.com>

On 6/17/22 17:28, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2022, David Matlack wrote:
>> Allow @vcpu to be NULL in kvm_mmu_find_shadow_page() (and its only
>> caller __kvm_mmu_get_shadow_page()). @vcpu is only required to sync
>> indirect shadow pages, so it's safe to pass in NULL when looking up
>> direct shadow pages.
>>
>> This will be used for doing eager page splitting, which allocates direct
> 
> "hugepage" again, because I need constant reminders :-)
> 
>> shadow pages from the context of a VM ioctl without access to a vCPU
>> pointer.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
>> ---
> 
> With nits addressed,
> 
> Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> 
>>   arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 13 +++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
>> index 4fbc2da47428..acb54d6e0ea5 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
>> @@ -1850,6 +1850,7 @@ static int kvm_sync_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
>>   
>>   	if (ret < 0)
>>   		kvm_mmu_prepare_zap_page(vcpu->kvm, sp, invalid_list);
>> +
> 
> Unrelated whitespace change leftover from the previous approach.
> 
>>   	return ret;
>>   }
>>   
>> @@ -2001,6 +2002,7 @@ static void clear_sp_write_flooding_count(u64 *spte)
>>   	__clear_sp_write_flooding_count(sptep_to_sp(spte));
>>   }
>>   
>> +/* Note, @vcpu may be NULL if @role.direct is true. */
>>   static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_find_shadow_page(struct kvm *kvm,
>>   						     struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>   						     gfn_t gfn,
>> @@ -2039,6 +2041,16 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_find_shadow_page(struct kvm *kvm,
>>   			goto out;
>>   
>>   		if (sp->unsync) {
>> +			/*
>> +			 * A vCPU pointer should always be provided when finding
> 
> s/should/must, and "be provided" in unnecessarily ambiguous, simply state that
> "@vcpu must be non-NULL".  E.g. if a caller provides a pointer, but that pointer
> happens to be NULL.
> 
>> +			 * indirect shadow pages, as that shadow page may
>> +			 * already exist and need to be synced using the vCPU
>> +			 * pointer. Direct shadow pages are never unsync and
>> +			 * thus do not require a vCPU pointer.
>> +			 */
> 
> "vCPU pointer" over and over is a bit versbose, and I prefer to refer to vCPUs/VMs
> as objects themselves.  E.g. "XYZ requires a vCPU" versus "XYZ requires a vCPU
> pointer" since it's not the pointer itself that's required, it's all the context
> of the vCPU that is needed.
> 
> 			/*
> 			 * @vcpu must be non-NULL when finding indirect shadow
> 			 * pages, as such pages may already exist and need to
> 			 * be synced, which requires a vCPU.  Direct pages are
> 			 * never unsync and thus do not require a vCPU.
> 			 */

My own take:

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index d7987420bb26..a7748c5a2385 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -1975,7 +1975,12 @@ static void clear_sp_write_flooding_count(u64 *spte)
  	__clear_sp_write_flooding_count(sptep_to_sp(spte));
  }
  
-/* Note, @vcpu may be NULL if @role.direct is true. */
+/*
+ * The vCPU is required when finding indirect shadow pages; the shadow
+ * page may already exist and syncing it needs the vCPU pointer in
+ * order to read guest page tables.  Direct shadow pages are never
+ * unsync, thus @vcpu can be NULL if @role.direct is true.
+ */
  static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_find_shadow_page(struct kvm *kvm,
  						     struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
  						     gfn_t gfn,
@@ -2014,13 +2019,6 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_find_shadow_page(struct kvm *kvm,
  			goto out;
  
  		if (sp->unsync) {
-			/*
-			 * The vCPU pointer is required when finding indirect
-			 * shadow pages, as that shadow page may already exist
-			 * exist and need to be synced using the vCPU pointer.
-			 * Direct shadow pages are never unsync and thus do not
-			 * require a vCPU pointer.
-			 */
  			if (KVM_BUG_ON(!vcpu, kvm))
  				break;
  
@@ -2101,7 +2099,7 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_alloc_shadow_page(struct kvm *kvm,
  	return sp;
  }
  
-/* Note, @vcpu may be NULL if @role.direct is true. */
+/* Note, @vcpu may be NULL if @role.direct is true; see kvm_mmu_find_shadow_page. */
  static struct kvm_mmu_page *__kvm_mmu_get_shadow_page(struct kvm *kvm,
  						      struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
  						      struct shadow_page_caches *caches,


  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-22 14:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-16 23:21 [PATCH v6 00/22] KVM: Extend Eager Page Splitting to the shadow MMU David Matlack
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 01/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Optimize MMU page cache lookup for all direct SPs David Matlack
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 02/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Use a bool for direct David Matlack
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 03/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Stop passing @direct to mmu_alloc_root() David Matlack
2022-06-16 18:47   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-22 14:06     ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-06-22 14:19       ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 04/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Derive shadow MMU page role from parent David Matlack
2022-06-17  1:19   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-17 15:12   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 05/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Always pass 0 for @quadrant when gptes are 8 bytes David Matlack
2022-06-17 15:20   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 06/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Decompose kvm_mmu_get_page() into separate functions David Matlack
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 07/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Consolidate shadow page allocation and initialization David Matlack
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 08/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Rename shadow MMU functions that deal with shadow pages David Matlack
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 09/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Move guest PT write-protection to account_shadowed() David Matlack
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 10/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Pass memory caches to allocate SPs separately David Matlack
2022-06-17 15:01   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-21 17:06     ` David Matlack
2022-06-21 17:27       ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 11/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Replace vcpu with kvm in kvm_mmu_alloc_shadow_page() David Matlack
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 12/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Pass kvm pointer separately from vcpu to kvm_mmu_find_shadow_page() David Matlack
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 13/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Allow NULL @vcpu in kvm_mmu_find_shadow_page() David Matlack
2022-06-17 15:28   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-22 14:26     ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 14/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Pass const memslot to rmap_add() David Matlack
2022-06-17 15:30   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 15/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Decouple rmap_add() and link_shadow_page() from kvm_vcpu David Matlack
2022-06-17 16:39   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 16/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Update page stats in __rmap_add() David Matlack
2022-06-17 16:40   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 17/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Cache the access bits of shadowed translations David Matlack
2022-06-17 16:53   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 18/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Extend make_huge_page_split_spte() for the shadow MMU David Matlack
2022-06-17 16:56   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 19/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Zap collapsible SPTEs in shadow MMU at all possible levels David Matlack
2022-06-17 17:01   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-21 17:24     ` David Matlack
2022-06-21 17:59       ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 20/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Refactor drop_large_spte() David Matlack
2022-06-17 17:11   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-22 16:13     ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-06-22 16:50       ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 21/22] KVM: Allow for different capacities in kvm_mmu_memory_cache structs David Matlack
2022-05-19 15:33   ` Anup Patel
2022-05-20 23:21   ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-05-23 17:37     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-23 17:44       ` David Matlack
2022-05-23 18:13         ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-05-23 18:22           ` David Matlack
2022-05-23 23:53             ` David Matlack
2022-06-17 17:41   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-17 18:34     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 22/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Extend Eager Page Splitting to nested MMUs David Matlack
2022-06-01 21:50   ` Ricardo Koller
2022-06-17 19:08   ` Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=75f7f353-3cb1-8d0f-1148-8a916bf575a3@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com \
    --cc=anup@brainfault.org \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=bgardon@google.com \
    --cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=drjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maciej.szmigiero@oracle.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=pfeiner@google.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).