Linux MIPS Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Juan Quintela <quintela@mandrakesoft.com>
To: Hartvig Ekner <hartvig@ekner.info>
Cc: Linux MIPS mailing list <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: Aliasing in pgtable-bits.h (CONFIG_64BIT_PHYS_ADDR)
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2003 12:32:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <868yul2sa5.fsf@trasno.mitica> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3E9274F0.227008F7@ekner.info> (Hartvig Ekner's message of "Tue, 08 Apr 2003 09:06:24 +0200")

>>>>> "hartvig" == Hartvig Ekner <hartvig@ekner.info> writes:

hartvig> From pgtable-bits.h:
hartvig> #if defined(CONFIG_CPU_MIPS32) && defined(CONFIG_64BIT_PHYS_ADDR)

hartvig> #define _PAGE_PRESENT               (1<<6)  /* implemented in software
hartvig> */
hartvig> #define _PAGE_READ                  (1<<7)  /* implemented in software
hartvig> */
hartvig> #define _PAGE_WRITE                 (1<<8)  /* implemented in software
hartvig> */
hartvig> #define _PAGE_ACCESSED              (1<<9)  /* implemented in software
hartvig> */
hartvig> #define _PAGE_MODIFIED              (1<<10) /* implemented in software
hartvig> */

hartvig> #define  _PAGE_R4KBUG                (1<<0)  /* workaround for r4k bug
hartvig> */
hartvig> #define _PAGE_GLOBAL                (1<<0)

hartvig> Is  the aliasing between R4KBUG & GLOBAL intentional? This is the only
hartvig> CONFIG case where it
hartvig> is  done. Superficially, I can't see R4KBUG used anywhere, so maybe it
hartvig> doesn't matter. But
hartvig> if R4KBUG truly isn't used, why not consider removing it entirely from
hartvig> all PTE layouts?

I will bet that this is related to the comment in
arch/mips/mm/tlb-r4k.c workaround that is unimplemented:

/* We will need multiple versions of update_mmu_cache(), one that just
 * updates the TLB with the new pte(s), and another which also checks
 * for the R4k "end of page" hardware bug and does the needy.
 */

Anyways, it appears that affected CPUS are only r4k and r4400 or so,
no big deal for rest of CPU's.

Later, Juan.

-- 
In theory, practice and theory are the same, but in practice they 
are different -- Larry McVoy

  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-04-08 10:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-04-08  7:06 Aliasing in pgtable-bits.h (CONFIG_64BIT_PHYS_ADDR) Hartvig Ekner
2003-04-08  7:06 ` Hartvig Ekner
2003-04-08 10:32 ` Juan Quintela [this message]
2003-04-08 21:48   ` Ralf Baechle
2003-04-08 21:47 ` Ralf Baechle
2003-04-09 10:12   ` Maciej W. Rozycki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=868yul2sa5.fsf@trasno.mitica \
    --to=quintela@mandrakesoft.com \
    --cc=hartvig@ekner.info \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox