From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from relay1-d.mail.gandi.net (relay1-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95DD91D5178; Mon, 28 Oct 2024 13:39:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.183.193 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730122749; cv=none; b=iNducZNfxm322ZCdcoNWbGy0RDUzK2keK/oyNqovrLKDaOe0r16BXR2zHpFkqbEzE3GYQogJeMkw5EacMUVPZFh1DpcfV0vf6BNg0N2t4KRVnn3F/uc5Qb8wxOVk5tq86wyfYmXvEkoDeKwsnZbqPDBHLis3OL3/ctrOoiwc6VM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730122749; c=relaxed/simple; bh=J6TygS9PS/UbaVj4c/knKhqWU5qE1QtSevjNgC5vI7E=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=GGYQYkyTo0wFqB4QF00qfazqUQQ2pynysXMJVYnFqRVfMpio64e9e6Zr6iBwB3ge3VDPbWB+6fuJsdoYliHGeNuMCSOlWPP9D4E1p0/QFnFcM8n08DOfWYIKtoHvsrGYALf662kikUt+uRvsk36GAZ5Ep2q+vxaM52/ILdVFUnY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b=hGOAgT/i; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.183.193 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b="hGOAgT/i" Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DE5F324000D; Mon, 28 Oct 2024 13:39:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1730122745; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=J6TygS9PS/UbaVj4c/knKhqWU5qE1QtSevjNgC5vI7E=; b=hGOAgT/iQxsWL1uStdCNwfhUTRbMQXtpmTXqUoeJLFB26KR/yQ5OmibLA+MliAaZATzpOE K109JGcBrWxYgELGMSgrz5+J90iLjVeB8TYARbMMrOgzOSZqu+bLLmGRraCVWhgBkxLgE6 D51igWNDdIzO0OFMgDiXVB2Cqchl+keSf6kwuIP1/Zosh5vzsJhhPWr2bQl/bFYvnl625A ccwEZCb2wGEnuPC/9WtXshEfHKmXWUFwC7BGU/KBa0uQAAdV5uxPzPPmukv5GYO1afyNWS jaw5yuWtmcXJxit/7n6aDm45i5UN0HsZf1bldWIpBbL7SY9Wixbxa8ESQymfpw== From: Gregory CLEMENT To: Aleksandar Rikalo Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer , Chao-ying Fu , Daniel Lezcano , Geert Uytterhoeven , Greg Ungerer , Hauke Mehrtens , Ilya Lipnitskiy , Jiaxun Yang , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier , Paul Burton , Peter Zijlstra , Serge Semin , Thomas Gleixner , Tiezhu Yang Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/12] MIPS: Support I6500 multi-cluster configuration In-Reply-To: References: <20241019071037.145314-1-arikalo@gmail.com> <87plnob4qq.fsf@BLaptop.bootlin.com> Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 14:39:01 +0100 Message-ID: <87cyjkbb4a.fsf@BLaptop.bootlin.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-GND-Sasl: gregory.clement@bootlin.com Hello Aleksandar, > Hello Gregory, > > Thank you! > Just to be clear, which patches can I put your "tested-by" on? Good question ! :) I've tested the entire series of patches together, rather than applying each individual patch separately. Although I'm not entirely certain, my best guess would be that you can safely put my 'tested-by' tag on each one. > > I'm preparing series v8. You could also include the other patches I sent on Friday in this series, as suggested by Thomas. Thanks, Gregory > > -- > Aleksandar > > On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 5:07=E2=80=AFPM Gregory CLEMENT > wrote: > >> Hello Aleksandar, >> >> >> I successfully tested it on an EyeQ6H SoC. On top of v6.12-rc4 I also >> added only one patch needed for EyeQ6H: >> >> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20241011-eyeq6h-smp-v2-1-8381edf8a5c6@bootl= in.com/#t >> >> So for EyeQ6H, you can then add my >> Tested-by: Gregory CLEMENT >> >> Then I also tested it on an EyeQ5, where the VP topology is >> {2,2,2,2},{}. In this case there is no CPU core in the second >> cluster. While some part of your series seems to support this case, it >> was not complete. I am about to send a new patch for it >> >> Thanks, >> Gregory >>