Linux MIPS Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, John Crispin <john@phrozen.org>,
	Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] of/fdt: Rework early_init_dt_scan_memory() to call directly
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 23:46:51 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87fsqwn03o.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211208155839.4084795-1-robh@kernel.org>

Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> writes:
> Use of the of_scan_flat_dt() function predates libfdt and is discouraged
> as libfdt provides a nicer set of APIs. Rework
> early_init_dt_scan_memory() to be called directly and use libfdt.
...
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
> index 6e1a106f02eb..63762a3b75e8 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
> @@ -532,19 +532,19 @@ static int  __init early_init_drmem_lmb(struct drmem_lmb *lmb,
>  }
>  #endif /* CONFIG_PPC_PSERIES */
>  
> -static int __init early_init_dt_scan_memory_ppc(unsigned long node,
> -						const char *uname,
> -						int depth, void *data)
> +static int __init early_init_dt_scan_memory_ppc(void)
>  {
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_PSERIES
> -	if (depth == 1 &&
> -	    strcmp(uname, "ibm,dynamic-reconfiguration-memory") == 0) {
> +	const void *fdt = initial_boot_params;
> +	int node = fdt_path_offset(fdt, "/ibm,dynamic-reconfiguration-memory");
> +
> +	if (node > 0) {
>  		walk_drmem_lmbs_early(node, NULL, early_init_drmem_lmb);
>  		return 0;
>  	}
>  #endif
>  	
> -	return early_init_dt_scan_memory(node, uname, depth, data);
> +	return early_init_dt_scan_memory();
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -749,7 +749,7 @@ void __init early_init_devtree(void *params)
>  
>  	/* Scan memory nodes and rebuild MEMBLOCKs */
>  	early_init_dt_scan_root();
> -	of_scan_flat_dt(early_init_dt_scan_memory_ppc, NULL);
> +	early_init_dt_scan_memory_ppc();
>  
>  	parse_early_param();
>  
> @@ -858,7 +858,7 @@ void __init early_get_first_memblock_info(void *params, phys_addr_t *size)
>  	 */
>  	add_mem_to_memblock = 0;
>  	early_init_dt_scan_root();
> -	of_scan_flat_dt(early_init_dt_scan_memory_ppc, NULL);
> +	early_init_dt_scan_memory_ppc();
>  	add_mem_to_memblock = 1;
>  
>  	if (size)


This blows up one of my machines with:

  [    0.000000][    T0] printk: bootconsole [udbg0] enabled
   -> early_setup(), dt_ptr: 0x1ec90000
  [    0.000000][    T0] ------------[ cut here ]------------
  [    0.000000][    T0] kernel BUG at arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hash_utils.c:2117!
  [    0.000000][    T0] Oops: Exception in kernel mode, sig: 5 [#1]
  [    0.000000][    T0] LE PAGE_SIZE=64K MMU=Hash SMP NR_CPUS=2048 NUMA
  [    0.000000][    T0] Modules linked in:
  [    0.000000][    T0] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.16.0-rc4-00073-g81291383ffde-dirty #69
  [    0.000000][    T0] NIP:  c0000000000924d8 LR: c000000002009764 CTR: c0000000000924d0
  [    0.000000][    T0] REGS: c000000002833bc0 TRAP: 0700   Not tainted  (5.16.0-rc4-00073-g81291383ffde-dirty)
  [    0.000000][    T0] MSR:  8000000000021003 <SF,ME,RI,LE>  CR: 24000244  XER: 20000001
  [    0.000000][    T0] CFAR: 0000000000000730 IRQMASK: 1
  [    0.000000][    T0] GPR00: c000000002009764 c000000002833e60 c000000002834100 ffffffffffffffff
  [    0.000000][    T0] GPR04: 0000000000000000 c000000002080866 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
  [    0.000000][    T0] GPR08: c000000002080864 0000000000000001 c0000000028d4100 c000000000ffe598
  [    0.000000][    T0] GPR12: c0000000000924d0 c000000002082200 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
  [    0.000000][    T0] GPR16: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
  [    0.000000][    T0] GPR20: 0000000000000001 0000000010004604 0000000000000000 0000000010004bfc
  [    0.000000][    T0] GPR24: 0000000000000000 c000000000000000 0000000002970000 c00000000008a480
  [    0.000000][    T0] GPR28: c0000000028e19f8 c00000001ec90000 c000000002865af8 000000001ec90000
  [    0.000000][    T0] NIP [c0000000000924d8] hash__setup_initial_memory_limit+0x18/0x110
  [    0.000000][    T0] LR [c000000002009764] early_init_devtree+0x13c/0x4ec
  [    0.000000][    T0] Call Trace:
  [    0.000000][    T0] [c000000002833e60] [c0000000020096fc] early_init_devtree+0xd4/0x4ec (unreliable)
  [    0.000000][    T0] [c000000002833f10] [c00000000200b008] early_setup+0xc8/0x22c
  [    0.000000][    T0] [c000000002833f90] [000000000000d368] 0xd368
  [    0.000000][    T0] Instruction dump:
  [    0.000000][    T0] 4bffff0c eaa10028 4bffff44 60000000 60000000 60420000 3c4c027a 38421c40
  [    0.000000][    T0] 7c0802a6 4bfe2e5d 3123ffff 7d291910 <0b090000> 3d220003 392919f8 e9290000
  [    0.000000][    T0] random: get_random_bytes called from oops_exit+0x54/0xa0 with crng_init=0
  [    0.000000][    T0] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---


It's complaining about memstart_addr being 0, which implies
early_init_dt_add_memory_arch() was never called.

Will try and get some more debug tomorrow.

cheers


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-12-13 12:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-08 15:58 [PATCH v2] of/fdt: Rework early_init_dt_scan_memory() to call directly Rob Herring
2021-12-11  0:18 ` Frank Rowand
2021-12-13 12:46 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2021-12-13 18:18   ` Rob Herring
2021-12-14 11:18     ` Michael Ellerman
2021-12-14 14:40       ` Rob Herring
2021-12-15 10:25         ` Michael Ellerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87fsqwn03o.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au \
    --to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=john@phrozen.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox