From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Tue, 20 Jan 2004 13:44:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [IPv6:::ffff:212.5.174.154] ([IPv6:::ffff:212.5.174.154]:15498 "EHLO zelcom.ru") by linux-mips.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 13:44:06 +0000 Received: from Pony.ns.zel.ru (70-com-st.gorcom.ru [212.45.15.70] (may be forged)) by zelcom.ru (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id i0KDi0Tq013760 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 16:44:02 +0300 Received: from mailserver sic-elvis =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=1Cby?= Pony.ns.zel.ru with =?ISO-8859-1?Q?ESMTP=1C?= id i0KDfx9U056010 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 16:41:59 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from deepfire@sic-elvis.zel.ru) Received: from mailserver sic-elvis by Pony.ns.zel.ru with ESMTP id i0KDfw9U056001 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 16:41:58 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from deepfire@sic-elvis.zel.ru) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 16:42:46 +0300 Message-ID: <87fzeaviqx.wl@canopus.ns.zel.ru> From: Samium Gromoff To: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: a shared cache_op() macros? References: <87hdyqvjh2.wl@canopus.ns.zel.ru> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.10.1 (Watching The Wheels) SEMI/1.14.5 (Awara-Onsen) FLIM/1.14.5 (Demachiyanagi) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.3 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.5 - "Awara-Onsen") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 4061 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: deepfire@sic-elvis.zel.ru Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips While pondering for some generic mips cache initialisation routines, i have found a precious cache_op() macro in mm/r5k-sc.c. And the question is, why isn`t it shared amongst all of the implementations which could make use of it? regards, Samium Gromoff