Linux MIPS Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
To: "Benoît Monin" <benoit.monin@bootlin.com>,
	"Thomas Bogendoerfer" <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
	"Daniel Lezcano" <daniel.lezcano@kernel.org>,
	"Dragan Mladjenovic" <dragan.mladjenovic@syrmia.com>,
	"Chao-ying Fu" <cfu@wavecomp.com>,
	"Aleksandar Rikalo" <arikalo@gmail.com>,
	"Paul Burton" <paulburton@kernel.org>
Cc: "Vladimir Kondratiev" <vladimir.kondratiev@mobileye.com>,
	"Tawfik Bayouk" <tawfik.bayouk@mobileye.com>,
	"Gregory CLEMENT" <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>,
	"Théo Lebrun" <theo.lebrun@bootlin.com>,
	"Thomas Petazzoni" <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
	linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] clocksource: mips-gic-timer: Set next GIC event on the correct VP
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2026 18:42:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ik4oc48u.ffs@fw13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <-6r_yDA2RwW_Yn6kas-7SQ@bootlin.com>

On Tue, Sep 01 2026 at 17:53, Benoît Monin wrote:
> On Thursday, 20 August 2026 at 10:41:29 CEST, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> > On a multi-cluster system each cluster has its own GIC. The VO window of
>> > the local GIC is what write_gic_vl_other() redirects, so when the target
>> > CPU belongs to another cluster, write_gic_vo_compare() lands in the
>> > wrong GIC, overwriting the COMPARE register of a VP in the local cluster.
>> 
>> The MIPS GIC clockevent device is strictly registered per CPU with the
>> cpumask of that CPU. See gic_clockevent_cpu_init().
>> 
>> The set_next_event() callback of a per CPU clockevent device is _always_
>> invoked on that CPU and cannot be invoked on a different CPU.
>> 
>> So I completely fail to understand what this cluster and non-current CPU
>> voodoo is about.
>> 
> Going through the log, here is what I found:
>
> The commit 414408d0eedd ("MIPS: allow GIC clockevent device config
> from other CPUs") was merged in v3.16, its intent was to make the GIC
> clockevent usable as a tick broadcast device.

Ah. Nice detective work.

> Also in v3.16, the commit 0467811e9bdb ("MIPS: mark GIC clockevent device
> with CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_C3STOP") sets the C3STOP flag. With this flag, as
> I understand it, the GIC clockevent cannot be used as a tick broadcast
> device. So the set_next_event() callback is always invoked on the CPU
> of the event.

Correct. A broadcast device cannot stop. The whole point of a broadcast
decive is to act as a global backup for per CPU devices which are
affected by C3STOP. The PPC people added a hrtimer broadcast device to
handle the case where no other devices are available

> The `if/else` was added later in v4.15 by commit f16ff2bdb135
> ("clocksource/drivers/mips-gic-timer: Add fastpath for local timer
> updates"). But the `else` path was never called.

So my assumption about voodoo was not too far off :)

> I am going to drop the `else` path, should I also add the
> CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_PERCPU flag, or is C3STOP and the cpumask enough?

You can, though the device i already excluded from being qualified for
broadcast by C3STOP. But for clarity sake, yes.

Thanks,

        tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-01 16:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-10 14:25 [PATCH v2 0/5] MIPS: GIC clocksource/irqchip improvements and fixes for multi-cluster systems Benoît Monin
2026-08-10 14:25 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] irqchip/mips-gic: Fix unbalanced cm_core_lock in for_each_online_cpu_gic() Benoît Monin
2026-08-10 14:25 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] irqchip/mips-gic: Fix recursive acquisition of gic_lock in gic_set_affinity() Benoît Monin
2026-08-10 14:25 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] irqchip/mips-gic: Enable interrupt when moving affinity across clusters Benoît Monin
2026-08-10 14:25 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] clocksource: mips-gic-timer: Set next GIC event on the correct VP Benoît Monin
2026-08-20  8:41   ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-09-01 15:53     ` Benoît Monin
2026-09-01 16:42       ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2026-08-10 14:25 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] clocksource: mips-gic-timer: Use local counter on synced multi-cluster systems Benoît Monin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87ik4oc48u.ffs@fw13 \
    --to=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=arikalo@gmail.com \
    --cc=benoit.monin@bootlin.com \
    --cc=cfu@wavecomp.com \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@kernel.org \
    --cc=dragan.mladjenovic@syrmia.com \
    --cc=gregory.clement@bootlin.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulburton@kernel.org \
    --cc=tawfik.bayouk@mobileye.com \
    --cc=theo.lebrun@bootlin.com \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
    --cc=vladimir.kondratiev@mobileye.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox