From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Mon, 10 May 2004 21:44:11 +0100 (BST) Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([IPv6:::ffff:66.187.233.31]:16005 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by linux-mips.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 10 May 2004 21:44:10 +0100 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i4AKi90m022851; Mon, 10 May 2004 16:44:09 -0400 Received: from localhost (mail@vpnuser4.surrey.redhat.com [172.16.9.4]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i4AKi8v24232; Mon, 10 May 2004 16:44:08 -0400 Received: from rsandifo by localhost with local (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1BNHdA-0003Ez-00; Mon, 10 May 2004 21:44:08 +0100 To: "Bradley D. LaRonde" Cc: , Subject: Re: uclibc mips ld.so and undefined symbols with nonzero symbol table entry st_value References: <045b01c43155$1e06cd80$8d01010a@prefect> <874qqpg2ti.fsf@redhat.com> <012701c43607$83aa65f0$8d01010a@prefect> <87pt9cwwzu.fsf@redhat.com> <00e201c436b9$5fa0f450$8d01010a@prefect> <878yg0m9db.fsf@redhat.com> <01a901c436ce$7029d890$8d01010a@prefect> <87oeowkoa6.fsf@redhat.com> From: Richard Sandiford Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 21:44:08 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87oeowkoa6.fsf@redhat.com> (Richard Sandiford's message of "Mon, 10 May 2004 21:41:53 +0100") Message-ID: <87k6zkko6f.fsf@redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 4968 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: rsandifo@redhat.com Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips Richard Sandiford writes: > "Bradley D. LaRonde" writes: >> I read this in the spec: >> >> All externally visible symbols, both defined and undefined, >> must be hashed into the hash table. >> >> Should libpthread's malloc stub be added to the hash table? > > Yes. Or, to be more precise, the symbol should be added to the hash table. The fact that the symbol is lazily bound doesn't matter. Richard From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: uclibc mips ld.so and undefined symbols with nonzero symbol table entry st_value References: <045b01c43155$1e06cd80$8d01010a@prefect> <874qqpg2ti.fsf@redhat.com> <012701c43607$83aa65f0$8d01010a@prefect> <87pt9cwwzu.fsf@redhat.com> <00e201c436b9$5fa0f450$8d01010a@prefect> <878yg0m9db.fsf@redhat.com> <01a901c436ce$7029d890$8d01010a@prefect> <87oeowkoa6.fsf@redhat.com> From: Richard Sandiford Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 21:44:08 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87oeowkoa6.fsf@redhat.com> (Richard Sandiford's message of "Mon, 10 May 2004 21:41:53 +0100") Message-ID: <87k6zkko6f.fsf@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-Path: Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org To: "Bradley D. LaRonde" Cc: uclibc@uclibc.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org Message-ID: <20040510204408.UArVCcW0SFJsoO-BdhMqS64B7LVoldZk-pbDOE8yMKE@z> Richard Sandiford writes: > "Bradley D. LaRonde" writes: >> I read this in the spec: >> >> All externally visible symbols, both defined and undefined, >> must be hashed into the hash table. >> >> Should libpthread's malloc stub be added to the hash table? > > Yes. Or, to be more precise, the symbol should be added to the hash table. The fact that the symbol is lazily bound doesn't matter. Richard