From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from relay9-d.mail.gandi.net (relay9-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAC6221A4AA; Fri, 25 Oct 2024 15:58:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.183.199 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729871894; cv=none; b=rk1MzV0PLDd3Dr1L+t3HF481aZBM102BYD4LNgAukWAaVhFFLYurQbjXjwsd8qoFekuK5ZduIw7cAzH6EU2VJhXP4qHvgbGdrc5VGo9Vg125DawQjiEea9NFBvmI9UV8B7GhMIJ8hbBJ5oa9ean+Ni+2fRtDuphtxXUmjbLhun0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729871894; c=relaxed/simple; bh=utSRbGiJSI1rH8t1Nq6oMWDqisqOLMjOCQleWIvPc+k=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=PP7Pw54jzdaQLFQQJXf1VQy59fTSkDrwWF9DRpLuTqYNDy2MGqg8pMirDNiiOC/V2YMPlTTPfaW9yhb3bCZD3McZZwsTb0Jaf9eq30u9cdX9xwBHD42Z8RzHkb97pTlg4hilTh4OXJ2YrSu7EkjjxG5IkHQIugjrlt6dA1D9PV0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b=c7JdvuDe; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.183.199 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b="c7JdvuDe" Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 616B0FF803; Fri, 25 Oct 2024 15:58:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1729871889; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=utSRbGiJSI1rH8t1Nq6oMWDqisqOLMjOCQleWIvPc+k=; b=c7JdvuDe/kR0oAGeK0EjQH4OvEr4rV+7Vvz8yVBH2GmLuVqnMSH0C85md9IqJyoEc0iYyr sVgFSSA1Wby3MLRtHbyXAox1/VY1TgMVY7R3a5bb98JidDtKNQc+wQ0vniBu71dAwMIhuB oMcc2H8E+VGjTkRfDtgZS/7u9zsGz0wrehEtLakP2hP4CDXNWpYyCg6d3v43IkrdYN0KHu vslbkS0/7ZF3voS6fKgJCWMNZTQsAJGvKNmz3Bg5704m2B1DaOoAoTgcf6TVBa9BJJI12F bse2SoO6ic2vwjyw4IE+wrbYUytzY4CKwPSdarCn4M+Tif+LLoHrF+uhAzNlhg== From: Gregory CLEMENT To: Aleksandar Rikalo , Thomas Bogendoerfer Cc: Aleksandar Rikalo , Chao-ying Fu , Daniel Lezcano , Geert Uytterhoeven , Greg Ungerer , Hauke Mehrtens , Ilya Lipnitskiy , Jiaxun Yang , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier , Paul Burton , Peter Zijlstra , Serge Semin , Thomas Gleixner , Tiezhu Yang Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/12] MIPS: Support I6500 multi-cluster configuration In-Reply-To: <87plnob4qq.fsf@BLaptop.bootlin.com> References: <20241019071037.145314-1-arikalo@gmail.com> <87plnob4qq.fsf@BLaptop.bootlin.com> Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 17:58:08 +0200 Message-ID: <87msisb2en.fsf@BLaptop.bootlin.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-GND-Sasl: gregory.clement@bootlin.com [...] > > Then I also tested it on an EyeQ5, where the VP topology is > {2,2,2,2},{}. In this case there is no CPU core in the second > cluster. While some part of your series seems to support this case, it > was not complete. I am about to send a new patch for it I wanted to send it as a follow-up email, but I didn't manage to do so previously. So, here is the link to this patch: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20241025-no-cpu-cluster-support-v1-1-5e81fcf9f25c@bootlin.com/#t Thanks, Gregory