Linux MIPS Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: offer@sgi.com (richard offer)
To: linux@morgaine.engr.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Good news: no more begging for HW
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 1997 09:23:12 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9706170923.ZM15068@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: "David S. Miller" <davem@jenolan.rutgers.edu> "Re: Good news: no more begging for HW" (Jun 16, 10:01pm)


* $ from davem@jenolan.rutgers.edu at "16-Jun:10:01pm" | sed "1,$s/^/* /"
*
*
*    From: ariel@yon.engr.sgi.com (Ariel Faigon)
*    Date: Mon, 16 Jun 1997 18:06:41 -0700 (PDT)
*
*    I cannot promise anything since there may be some oversubscription
*    to the service :-)
*
*    I think the fairest way would be to publish all these requests on
*    this forum and have the people who care (us) vote on who should get
*    them.  I certainly don't want to be the fascist person who decides
*    who gets what.
*
* Before this gets out of control, I just want to express one sentiment
* of high caution.
*
* Although it may seem desirable to contribute most of the donation
* hardware to kernel level hackers, this can be a mistake in the making.
* At this stage in the game it is just as important to get userland/libc
* developers machines.
*
* Therefore I suggest that at least one person who knows GNU libc,
* binutils, _and_ gcc internals backwards and forwards be on the top of
* the donation list.

We need an X server if we are ever going to get it usable by real users---or is
everyone assuming its for headles machines only. I would put an X server above
most applications in terms of priority (just below native gcc/libc).

Perhaps one ought to go to Xfree86/someone who knows our hardware (not to start
this thread all over again).

This should be very tighly focused, since an X server is a lot of work and we
need a lot of them, one per board (okay in version one we could only support
1280x1024x8, but that seems a waste of all our spiffy hardware).

I used to have a contact in Xfree86, but I haven't heard from him for a while.

If someone takes the server, I'll try and get the clients libraries done
(assuming that I can get remote access to a box).

richard.

____________________________________________________________________

A Guest Signature from Laurent Duperval <Laurent at Grafnetix.com>

  I don't understand why people break up and then get back together.
  It's like going to the fridge, taking a carton of milk that has
  gone bad, then saying: "I'll put it back and see if it's better
  tomorrow."

  parent reply	other threads:[~1997-06-17 16:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <199706170046.CAA17216@informatik.uni-koblenz.de>
1997-06-17  1:06 ` Good news: no more begging for HW Ariel Faigon
1997-06-17  1:06   ` Ariel Faigon
1997-06-17  1:53   ` Alex deVries
1997-06-17  2:01   ` David S. Miller
     [not found]     ` <davem@jenolan.rutgers.edu>
1997-06-17 16:23       ` richard offer [this message]
1997-06-17 17:10         ` Miguel de Icaza
1997-06-17 17:49           ` Mike Shaver
1997-06-17 17:49             ` Mike Shaver
1997-06-17 17:53           ` richard offer
1997-06-17 18:00             ` Miguel de Icaza
1997-06-17 18:30               ` Martin Knoblauch
1997-06-17 18:45                 ` David S. Miller
1997-06-18  0:00             ` John Wiederhirn
1997-06-18  0:15               ` richard offer
1997-06-18  0:32                 ` Ralf Baechle
1997-06-18  0:32                   ` Ralf Baechle
1997-06-19 19:23                   ` William J. Earl
1997-06-18  0:34               ` Getting X on Linux/SGI Ariel Faigon
1997-06-18  0:34                 ` Ariel Faigon
1997-06-18 16:28                 ` Christopher W. Carlson
1997-06-18 19:30                   ` Nigel Gamble
1997-06-18  2:47               ` Good news: no more begging for HW Miguel de Icaza
1997-06-18 12:38               ` William J. Earl
1997-06-18 12:38                 ` William J. Earl
1997-06-18  6:37 Larry McVoy
1997-06-18  6:37 ` Larry McVoy
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1997-06-17  6:22 Larry McVoy
1997-06-17  9:46 ` Ralf Baechle
1997-06-17  9:46   ` Ralf Baechle
1997-06-17 16:08 ` Miguel de Icaza
1997-06-17  2:25 Larry McVoy
1997-06-17  2:25 ` Larry McVoy
1997-06-17  5:31 ` Alex deVries
1997-06-16 23:25 Ariel Faigon
1997-06-17  3:59 ` Christopher W. Carlson
1997-06-17  8:15 ` Martin Knoblauch
1997-06-17 16:18   ` Miguel de Icaza

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9706170923.ZM15068@sgi.com \
    --to=offer@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux@morgaine.engr.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox