From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from relay6-d.mail.gandi.net (relay6-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D82369312; Fri, 1 Mar 2024 09:41:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.183.198 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709286076; cv=none; b=EKAjEdxKt/4kiMLrQ9rcSfzx637J1x6tK4KMmBua2jkz9ywBkQe27//dJcm9hZNtt6F3dKO/PWmnrzDd+O4rEHQWh9jfnJLD451W95Mi1Q5h3NOZ6VkGLqUdNwbkuIVWu8Utu/Mk+sNvEAylu7yUDRb2zOPiEVotdU55Gwb/chM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709286076; c=relaxed/simple; bh=DlbN+IlGSuSBoRTtcplLOGm6dVJxnsnj3N4h136wbCk=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Subject:Cc:To:From: References:In-Reply-To; b=CJIbvgHow/Y8rdNuFRQWCdcSdZksArRqVB0cdnluPkqlFI6WENzR07XjY4MVYpVhrAUyA1B2tjiD3rgaCOTh9lNxur/bvAuncrFMMIa1DnK1yRgH/mWrienWoPYhJHDcb3bxZVXUTihnAb8gIuGf7P/KUgWADcwah/EgJvx+qok= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b=V1LViLZC; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.183.198 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b="V1LViLZC" Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 55480C000F; Fri, 1 Mar 2024 09:41:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1709286071; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=DlbN+IlGSuSBoRTtcplLOGm6dVJxnsnj3N4h136wbCk=; b=V1LViLZCbMkJd3hJlK1iz6yXpb8XMcGqdCRu1BKJp8BPvkkRpWcWMZ4ZUMJzm+o9OSkVuC vDJxfa1Yl/JUuYQuDktcTAMGc9QFw82RijvEgEHYRAm7PwqgTwczmOc9p0AnbTzlRWlaKK bG6sGLHFdpeEx1rK/jPzV1AdzrE4ILid1ukjZcihAkdaUf1joaZtm1lI9YZnE2+sdqmSFk mq3Y/tqm6Q6FaK2+zUAj04GGjT2aj5E9cUx5aFVmqR4UNdGfgGu7lp50dKghbQ1miji6qk jxe8aP1sD1Rd3Y4pTkf80z0VHNhwkrimOYXfRMtDVxdXlKl1riZ05FKG8CRS3A== Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2024 10:41:08 +0100 Message-Id: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/11] dt-bindings: hwmon: lm75: use common hwmon schema Cc: , , , , , "Gregory Clement" , "Vladimir Kondratiev" , "Thomas Petazzoni" , "Tawfik Bayouk" , "Jean Delvare" , To: "Guenter Roeck" , "Krzysztof Kozlowski" , "Linus Walleij" , "Andi Shyti" , "Rob Herring" , "Krzysztof Kozlowski" , "Conor Dooley" , "Thomas Bogendoerfer" From: =?utf-8?q?Th=C3=A9o_Lebrun?= X-Mailer: aerc 0.15.2 References: <20240229-mbly-i2c-v2-0-b32ed18c098c@bootlin.com> <20240229-mbly-i2c-v2-2-b32ed18c098c@bootlin.com> <6749c8df-c545-4aca-bc18-4dfe9c9f15b0@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: X-GND-Sasl: theo.lebrun@bootlin.com Hello, On Fri Mar 1, 2024 at 7:53 AM CET, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 2/29/24 22:37, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On 29/02/2024 19:10, Th=C3=A9o Lebrun wrote: > >> Reference common hwmon schema which has the generic "label" property, > >> parsed by Linux hwmon subsystem. > >> > >=20 > > Please do not mix independent patchsets. You create unneeded > > dependencies blocking this patch. This patch depends on hwmon work, so > > it cannot go through different tree. I had to pick between this or dtbs_check failing on my DTS that uses a label on temperature-sensor@48. > > If you insist to combine independent patches, then at least clearly > > express merging strategy or dependency in patch changelog --- . I do not know how such indirect conflicts are usually resolved. Hwmon can take it but MIPS might want to also take it to have valid DTS. Any advice? > For my part I have to say that I don't know what to do with it. > Rob's robot reported errors, so I won't apply it, and I don't > feel comfortable giving it an ack either because of those errors. Can reproduce the error when patch "dt-bindings: hwmon: add common properties" is not applied. Cannot reproduce when patch is applied. Commit d590900b62f0 on hwmon-next. Cannot reproduce with hwmon-next as parent. Regards, -- Th=C3=A9o Lebrun, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com