From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from relay7-d.mail.gandi.net (relay7-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09A4D6EB79; Fri, 1 Mar 2024 14:09:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.183.200 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709302199; cv=none; b=Bnr+UEKrpR+zxXLtrTwVnvOHztgPC91VTycKlvI0Z647OM3EQE0aO85tLkok+WoSrPeY9u+CO0lhavSV1QgFy46KaValqC4gN+6MsglXfylqJA3zVXh0WaKjC+DleYkESf5uTUH8NQj4bPvBfophCVq6/wheNXWYRUJs75UwNRc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709302199; c=relaxed/simple; bh=8SNJXFocJybYWAAETOVv1TEYZIaxUQ2TZ7T/99SzvUM=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:From:Subject:Cc:To: References:In-Reply-To; b=srbN0GoqR3vjHiwd0qlYeYq1QyOaa+cIbnLw5DOe9lwqF788cGrnWnRMiy7neEkw/f06SqsZqfO8Yp5JCvC1h6/vLLSyY+xOnJtTz7I/SlBw/qn1qE9LfGKmJLyVDfUeKiIjXA7Tsi5mqeurSeNl8jBBjln1gd7YGZPt+mrCNlo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b=lM8WOcga; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.183.200 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b="lM8WOcga" Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D87D22000E; Fri, 1 Mar 2024 14:09:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1709302192; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=8SNJXFocJybYWAAETOVv1TEYZIaxUQ2TZ7T/99SzvUM=; b=lM8WOcgal/GAYSfmKYiFd2PrZduh0Lidq2w93U4R1WOTMwx/ACXg69RwP2dvQzAZTxAJl6 Zs66mf73xi1zf52UoZjbjgVdcvDR4eoKiUP0LLqhlJ0JBTD+32HlN0d6wpTJJR/gLbBS25 DiKMiQYvPJdsDD4+FMQv7Lgw/GS3mGL4tqUZ9IuyKnRToydRSFcooe9I/+jLR0F9tAcDBk efI9Yh3S7GoL/2YisW39jiAPrD7NLU9TO54NyC+qq2vlc7IwyGlnD32y54WAlHGyVhbobT y59JAMOCS5ZkmdDuV26TmP0tuft5/+QEFB/sEQTG+se6yxzqUPv1MyaUlFtIWQ== Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2024 15:09:50 +0100 Message-Id: From: =?utf-8?q?Th=C3=A9o_Lebrun?= Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/11] dt-bindings: hwmon: lm75: use common hwmon schema Cc: , , , , , "Gregory Clement" , "Vladimir Kondratiev" , "Thomas Petazzoni" , "Tawfik Bayouk" , "Jean Delvare" , To: "Krzysztof Kozlowski" , "Guenter Roeck" , "Linus Walleij" , "Andi Shyti" , "Rob Herring" , "Krzysztof Kozlowski" , "Conor Dooley" , "Thomas Bogendoerfer" X-Mailer: aerc 0.15.2 References: <20240229-mbly-i2c-v2-0-b32ed18c098c@bootlin.com> <20240229-mbly-i2c-v2-2-b32ed18c098c@bootlin.com> <6749c8df-c545-4aca-bc18-4dfe9c9f15b0@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: X-GND-Sasl: theo.lebrun@bootlin.com Hello, On Fri Mar 1, 2024 at 12:35 PM CET, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 01/03/2024 11:44, Th=C3=A9o Lebrun wrote: > > On Fri Mar 1, 2024 at 11:13 AM CET, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >> On 01/03/2024 10:41, Th=C3=A9o Lebrun wrote: > >>> On Fri Mar 1, 2024 at 7:53 AM CET, Guenter Roeck wrote: > >>>> On 2/29/24 22:37, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >>>>> On 29/02/2024 19:10, Th=C3=A9o Lebrun wrote: > >>>>>> Reference common hwmon schema which has the generic "label" proper= ty, > >>>>>> parsed by Linux hwmon subsystem. > >>>>> > >>>>> Please do not mix independent patchsets. You create unneeded > >>>>> dependencies blocking this patch. This patch depends on hwmon work,= so > >>>>> it cannot go through different tree. > >>> > >>> I had to pick between this or dtbs_check failing on my DTS that uses = a > >>> label on temperature-sensor@48. > >> > >> I don't see how is that relevant. You can organize your branches as yo= u > >> wish, e.g. base one b4 branch on another and you will not have any war= nings. > >=20 > > That is what I do, I however do not want mips-next to have errors when > > running dtbs_check. Having dtbs_check return errors is not an issue? > > You should ask your maintainer, but I don't understand how this is > achievable anyway. Subsystem bindings *should not* go via MIPS-next, so > how are you going to solve this? I thought it'd go in hwmon-next and be picked up by mips-next as well. It's clear now that the right approach is to send the lm75.yaml patch alone. I'll wait some more before sending a new revision that drops this lm75.yaml patch. Have a nice day, -- Th=C3=A9o Lebrun, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com