Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] Usable clocks on Mobileye EyeQ5 & EyeQ6H

["Théo Lebrun" <theo.lebrun@bootlin.com>]

Hello Thomas,

On Wed Nov 6, 2024 at 5:03 PM CET, Théo Lebrun wrote:
> Now that clk-eyeq is in the clk-next tree, we can add the small(-ish)
> details required to make the platform work fully. The work is mostly
> about updating devicetrees to rely on the system-controller nodes as
> clock providers.

[...]

>  - clk:
>    [PATCH v2 01/10] dt-bindings: soc: mobileye: set `#clock-cells = <1>` for all compatibles
>    [PATCH v2 02/10] dt-bindings: clock: eyeq: add more Mobileye EyeQ5/EyeQ6H clocks
>    [PATCH v2 03/10] clk: fixed-factor: add clk_hw_register_fixed_factor_index() function
>    [PATCH v2 04/10] clk: eyeq: require clock index with phandle in all cases
>    [PATCH v2 05/10] clk: eyeq: add fixed factor clocks infrastructure
>    [PATCH v2 06/10] clk: eyeq: add EyeQ5 fixed factor clocks
>    [PATCH v2 07/10] clk: eyeq: add EyeQ6H central fixed factor clocks
>    [PATCH v2 08/10] clk: eyeq: add EyeQ6H west fixed factor clocks
>
>  - MIPS:
>    [PATCH v2 09/10] MIPS: mobileye: eyeq5: use OLB as provider for fixed factor clocks
>    [PATCH v2 10/10] MIPS: mobileye: eyeq6h: add OLB nodes OLB and remove fixed clocks

Do you think we can make those two patches go in before the next merge
window? Stephen just accepted the above patches. This makes both MIPS
platforms usable on upstream kernels!

Thanks,

--
Théo Lebrun, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com