From: Shane McDonald <mcdonald.shane@gmail.com>
To: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Unexpected behaviour when catching SIGFPE on FPU-less system
Date: Sun, 02 May 2010 20:17:23 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1O8lDn-0000Sk-86@localhost> (raw)
I have run into some strange behaviour involving using the FPU
emulation software in the MIPS kernel when trying to handle
a divide-by-zero-caused floating point exception.
I have come up with a simple test case to demonstrate this problem.
--
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <fenv.h>
#include <setjmp.h>
void fpe_handler(int);
jmp_buf env;
main()
{
double x;
feenableexcept( FE_DIVBYZERO );
signal( SIGFPE, fpe_handler );
if ( setjmp( env ) == 0 )
{
printf( "About to try calculation\n" );
x = 5.0 / 0.0;
printf( "Value is %f\n", x );
}
else
{
printf( "Calculation causes divide by zero\n" );
}
}
void fpe_handler(int x)
{
feclearexcept( FE_DIVBYZERO );
longjmp( env, 1 );
}
--
The program sets up to generate a SIGFPE when a divide-by-zero occurs,
rather than setting the result to infinity. Then, I've created a
handler to catch the exception, and the end result is to print out
the "Calculation causes divide by zero" message.
I have two MIPS-based systems, both running Debian Etch. One of the
systems is a PMC-Sierra RM7035C-based system, which includes an FPU. My
other system is a PMC-Sierra MSP7120-based system, which does not
include an FPU. The RM7035C system is running the 2.6.34-rc6 kernel,
but the MSP7120 system is running 2.6.28.
When I run this program on the system with the FPU, I see the results
that I expect to see. The program outputs:
About to try calculation
Calculation causes divide by zero
I see the same results when I run the program on an x86 Debian Etch system.
When I run the program on the system without the FPU, I see:
About to try calculation
Floating point exception
So, it appears that the floating point exception is not caught.
However, when I run strace, the last few lines of output are:
old_mmap(NULL, 65536, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x2ace9000
write(1, "About to try calculation\n"..., 25About to try calculation
) = 25
--- SIGFPE (Floating point exception) @ 0 (0) ---
--- SIGFPE (Floating point exception) @ 0 (0) ---
+++ killed by SIGFPE +++
Running it on the system with the FPU, I see:
old_mmap(NULL, 65536, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x2ace5000
write(1, "About to try calculation\n"..., 25About to try calculation
) = 25
--- SIGFPE (Floating point exception) @ 0 (0) ---
write(1, "Calculation causes divide by zero"..., 34Calculation causes divide by zero
) = 34
exit_group(34) = ?
After poking around for a while, and trying to account for differences
between the systems (endianness, FPUness, kernel version), I believe the
problem is related to the lack of FPU. If I run the RM7035C with a
disabled FPU (kernel parameter nofpu), I see the same results as on
the FPU-less MSP7120. So, I suspect this difference in behaviour
is caused by the FPU emulation software.
Now, I don't know if this is a problem, but it does seem strange.
My level of understanding of the FPU emulation software is very low,
so I'm not quite sure where to look.
This isn't actually something that I typically do. I noticed this
problem when trying to understand why the Debian package "yorick"
failed to build (see
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mips/2010/04/msg00019.html).
I'd appreciate any insight that anyone can provide. Thanks!
Shane McDonald
next reply other threads:[~2010-05-03 2:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-03 2:17 Shane McDonald [this message]
2010-05-03 20:39 ` Unexpected behaviour when catching SIGFPE on FPU-less system Kevin D. Kissell
2010-05-03 20:47 ` Kevin D. Kissell
[not found] ` <k2hb2b2f2321005031843l87f39f36h960153cae3ec5020@mail.gmail.com>
2010-05-04 2:04 ` Kevin D. Kissell
[not found] ` <n2pb2b2f2321005032049h56cd72ceh3ac7120c547b59c5@mail.gmail.com>
2010-05-04 4:35 ` Shane McDonald
2010-05-04 6:56 ` Shane McDonald
2010-05-04 7:13 ` Shane McDonald
2010-05-04 11:16 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2010-05-04 12:56 ` Shane McDonald
2010-05-04 16:13 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2010-05-04 18:44 ` Ralf Baechle
2010-05-04 18:58 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2010-05-04 19:28 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2010-05-04 19:30 ` Manuel Lauss
2010-05-04 19:44 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2010-05-04 20:01 ` David Daney
2010-05-04 21:23 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2010-05-04 18:55 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2010-05-04 21:52 ` Kevin D. Kissell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1O8lDn-0000Sk-86@localhost \
--to=mcdonald.shane@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox