From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 03:41:47 -0800 Received: from chmls20.mediaone.net ([24.147.1.156]:58872 "EHLO chmls20.mediaone.net") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 03:41:31 -0800 Received: from decoy (h00a0cc39f081.ne.mediaone.net [24.218.248.129]) by chmls20.mediaone.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id GAA08431; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 06:41:24 -0500 (EST) From: "Jay Carlson" To: , Subject: RE: The initial results (Re: stable binutils, gcc, glibc ... Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 06:43:25 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <39ED2166.9B5F970@mvista.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips-outgoing > I also had success with latest binutils CVS tree. I gave a try to the > latest gcc, but did not look into it further. > > http://sourceware.cygnus.com/binutils > cvs -z 9 -d :pserver:anoncvs@anoncvs.cygnus.com:/cvs/src co -D "Oct 13, > 2000" binutils OK, I've decided to bite the bullet and try to get current on everything. Most of the patches I've seen lying around have been integrated into binutils and gcc. Congratulations! However, there's still this lingering issue with binutils. The ulfc patches haven't been integrated, and I'm worried that I'm going to run into the "binutils generate busted relocs" problem as a result. What's the resolution of that issue? Patch still needed? Patch not needed if the only two binutils ever used are 2.8.1 and current-cvs (>2.10)? Jay From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jay Carlson" Subject: RE: The initial results (Re: stable binutils, gcc, glibc ... Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 06:43:25 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <39ED2166.9B5F970@mvista.com> Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Return-Path: To: linux-mips@fnet.fr, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <20001106114325.RXO7cCr1hDep2tfyrcXMtb0fZXbVfHkn5LleufuB5mc@z> > I also had success with latest binutils CVS tree. I gave a try to the > latest gcc, but did not look into it further. > > http://sourceware.cygnus.com/binutils > cvs -z 9 -d :pserver:anoncvs@anoncvs.cygnus.com:/cvs/src co -D "Oct 13, > 2000" binutils OK, I've decided to bite the bullet and try to get current on everything. Most of the patches I've seen lying around have been integrated into binutils and gcc. Congratulations! However, there's still this lingering issue with binutils. The ulfc patches haven't been integrated, and I'm worried that I'm going to run into the "binutils generate busted relocs" problem as a result. What's the resolution of that issue? Patch still needed? Patch not needed if the only two binutils ever used are 2.8.1 and current-cvs (>2.10)? Jay