From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 05:02:02 -0700 Received: from chmls05.mediaone.net ([24.147.1.143]:5370 "EHLO chmls05.mediaone.net") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 05:01:46 -0700 Received: from decoy (h00a0cc39f081.ne.mediaone.net [24.218.248.129]) by chmls05.mediaone.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id IAA01846; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 08:01:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jay Carlson" To: , "Jun Sun" Cc: , Subject: RE: stable binutils, gcc, glibc ... Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 08:03:24 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips-outgoing > {AJ} Either use as compiler egcs 1.1.2 or the current development > version of > gcc 2.96 from CVS. gcc 2.95.x does not work correctly on mips-linux. Why not 1.0.3a+patches? And could you mention a day that a 2.97 checkout was known to work? Jay From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jay Carlson" Subject: RE: stable binutils, gcc, glibc ... Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 08:03:24 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Return-Path: To: aj@suse.de, Jun Sun Cc: linux-mips@fnet.fr, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <20001020120324.0AkdJ2qTeRlFIuZQn3rsRjAZt4QppvHFpRa23dsLDUg@z> > {AJ} Either use as compiler egcs 1.1.2 or the current development > version of > gcc 2.96 from CVS. gcc 2.95.x does not work correctly on mips-linux. Why not 1.0.3a+patches? And could you mention a day that a 2.97 checkout was known to work? Jay