Re: [PATCH v9 0/5] KVM statistics data fd-based binary interface

[Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>]

On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 01:03:34PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 15/06/21 09:53, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > Sorry for my naive questions, but how does telemetry get statistics
> > > for hypervisors? Why is KVM different from hypervisors or NIC's statistics
> > > or any other high speed devices (RDMA) that generate tons of data?
> > 
> > So the answer to the question "why KVM is different" is that it doesn't
> > have any stable identification except file descriptor. While hypervisors
> > have stable names, NICs and RDMA devices have interface indexes etc.
> > Did I get it right?
> 
> Right.
> 
> > And this was second part of my question, the first part was my attempt to
> > get on answer why current statistics like process info (/proc/xxx/*), NICs
> > (netlink) and RDMA (sysfs) are not using binary format.
> 
> NICs are using binary format (partly in struct ethtool_stats, partly in an
> array of u64).  For KVM we decided to put the schema and the stats in the
> same file (though you can use pread to get only the stats) to have a single
> interface and avoid ioctls, unlike having both ETH_GSTRINGS and ETH_GSTATS.
> 
> I wouldn't say processes are using any specific format.  There's a mix of
> "one value per file" (e.g. cpuset), human-readable tabular format (e.g.
> limits, sched), human- and machine-readable tabular format (e.g. status),
> and files that are ASCII but not human-readable (e.g. stat).

I see, your explanation to Enrico cleared the mud.

Thanks

> 
> Paolo
>