From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EC5AC433F5 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 15:48:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E777D60F02 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 15:48:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233077AbhJYPuz (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Oct 2021 11:50:55 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58774 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232909AbhJYPuv (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Oct 2021 11:50:51 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x102f.google.com (mail-pj1-x102f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB739C061348 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 08:48:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x102f.google.com with SMTP id x1-20020a17090a530100b001a1efa4ebe6so242994pjh.0 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 08:48:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=0lZC/4YVNiq6m54gciVPWUG9HJx9IWHvMOAiOdASGoo=; b=QyfrOXYXYzIEyrLD44pl5e5qrBHvKskln3PRReuWzpAgV2++kLJzI050rqe2oVwX2v /YSSz3klIowpfUugVLMls4E5ALzM885A+JjaGYEd8dI6xPFGzSKWWGCwhTUoU1wJJ2+4 q6QXjhMZdsCR4vmwSFpvR/7/SOjlriEKOoj6W/QPj/mWp9yfleITVSt3gv9SSl80X7Ip BvJTrYEOJKTHV3pbSlO8IHWn3hT4T3KR9LJVANxEXG1UOo91F4D+Bcp+BL0MB5OCLaKP Mo/ai6V2iZC0VqjsN2MnwKzxW/qxPY5ehn5rtVsOHSmvZ7PywSIV88EiySKFBzouQ+tc 9/iA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=0lZC/4YVNiq6m54gciVPWUG9HJx9IWHvMOAiOdASGoo=; b=ox33GKCurd93xAksTH7VhLQWnGEDSNDeFYdLyXZW9gEt8yxnkxSxIHpN/NhiwBXya7 aROn1bRVCMnO5J8bU12l00Oq642Epkn9pN1hXzrapQ2+kabS56iGRXfoCHj2G+dssThL WCOaWDPoq7mysPa842Qqy7lsZM5Lvkz1aXqGEP0EdKPYhYKUAGE9GyuPKeiKsVC5tP30 CnXllRp9t/xhahCmPzPeCg+FKg7xNEHgti/0M7MAPp2EaVfaiO+Wprq/XNoxbd68Jb4X nYm2accX3TXnpavjpYE4ia/EW1Djuh8AaFyFBf83yaGQB/TNxD5v5+qTBnkVWtAhygpx oN4A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530f8NGY7+HdovTtX7hfeoSTpYAedaphsOORTtjerG/8kKp/J6xp NQalD52mIZgiclRearJE5lOMuA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxrKJ5kv/isPaW6TJ/VoEghKiV6FVNK9Q5PXIGPB6cKE19gMMU7U+s4ZFt4KBH5EHg4mjv+Qw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:bf0e:: with SMTP id c14mr5921807pjs.180.1635176908950; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 08:48:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com (157.214.185.35.bc.googleusercontent.com. [35.185.214.157]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g5sm11457677pfc.65.2021.10.25.08.48.28 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 25 Oct 2021 08:48:28 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 15:48:24 +0000 From: Sean Christopherson To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Marc Zyngier , Huacai Chen , Aleksandar Markovic , Paul Mackerras , Anup Patel , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Christian Borntraeger , Janosch Frank , James Morse , Alexandru Elisei , Suzuki K Poulose , Atish Patra , David Hildenbrand , Cornelia Huck , Claudio Imbrenda , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Wanpeng Li , Jim Mattson , Joerg Roedel , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Matlack , Oliver Upton , Jing Zhang Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 37/43] KVM: SVM: Unconditionally mark AVIC as running on vCPU load (with APICv) Message-ID: References: <20211009021236.4122790-1-seanjc@google.com> <20211009021236.4122790-38-seanjc@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 25, 2021, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 09/10/21 04:12, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > + /* TODO: Document why the unblocking path checks for updates. */ > > Is that a riddle or what? :) Yes? I haven't been able to figure out why the unblocking path explicitly checks and handles an APICv update.