From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9853BC433F5 for ; Wed, 29 Dec 2021 09:45:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235325AbhL2JpI (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Dec 2021 04:45:08 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56386 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235338AbhL2JpI (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Dec 2021 04:45:08 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x431.google.com (mail-wr1-x431.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::431]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89DA7C061401 for ; Wed, 29 Dec 2021 01:45:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wr1-x431.google.com with SMTP id t26so43318921wrb.4 for ; Wed, 29 Dec 2021 01:45:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=F5hLhwE+UU94IcLuo1agQhCW+8dMcyUFbhKonw1Ucwk=; b=zE5XYpxZ0bPeEWY7cgd6y5KzLBnlwEVy7Wv7OKMhNaVwYpaq5eYTiuINUZ3xh9vl+K 4q1GUx0gpNAiYZefFb++psP0mhjHNmiSId7/CLf560k1XmbE6+fK8AbHMXKLqUC7orDU 0/OIYZSEgOrdwU6kzMC3UZtLHsxWMtcwyLdJshSTCsocg5XIa6fPAqmqQVOxKf3mrgQO 6+ZiqTKfVP7hrQEwxgi890r/suEruLCNRurYGu3g1jl1hCVsIEqbLf21IoLnD4kZWXJs aFqpiPr450RvK9cMPcLYvJK8XOaZQcs7ncbMIoCsXjmZW0ZfGqLTdyGA1jT7hv5MnIr9 Cw8A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to; bh=F5hLhwE+UU94IcLuo1agQhCW+8dMcyUFbhKonw1Ucwk=; b=HQD1J97hnsW5M3Ws5h3CKfFiR6Wa1xUKAcMdGAxlsnJwt47XZkNmk0IfKHPDMI6wD1 lrWy65cGXzU+mKjdEnzwQTjDzFCEaL7CO7XSc2sDF/TRctjh3Z6f2bJHY1fjW/CsL0Tm AqsFM3PoN1fuR5ldPDK7/tEagHmiuifI8087jiOVyWIkC/UeTBbBAU1v47f4gQxJzGo+ ZYQGyzsfRxqdbLfMh+LdF6HvKaDq6LuyoFiaSIKnp5+ZErMu3GIeIk6z0Q59G8MP1ztO D3KKgTMX+ylLP5ZB5JyOY3k2tZBQgcx3GjV8+R8+kaGREfnebKMzbLINmAGzEVpK4yU+ +DyA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530qx/WB3o7EU89TVNoXD45e/k0iQThZFETKxtEWYfXqyEJo1MBI lS0yt0wszUr+oChN9mpSVjkSdA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzhZZghhYqWrqB+uDruMdOeh2UV7K4tAyZAPQXId5vBCn+1+woXAs3xtmU9d+Kjp/8JIz1J7g== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:186a:: with SMTP id d10mr20195785wri.347.1640771106104; Wed, 29 Dec 2021 01:45:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from google.com ([2.31.167.18]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e1sm21035556wrc.74.2021.12.29.01.45.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 29 Dec 2021 01:45:05 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2021 09:45:03 +0000 From: Lee Jones To: Wim Van Sebroeck Cc: Guenter Roeck , Florian Fainelli , =?utf-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= , Rob Herring , Justin Chen , bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, =?utf-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= , Rob Herring Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 RESEND 1/2] dt-bindings: watchdog: convert Broadcom's WDT to the json-schema Message-ID: References: <432664af-5660-aaad-bf75-81e4d61cb078@roeck-us.net> <46a88b40-6d92-727c-7adc-5723921d08e3@gmail.com> <20211206195115.GC3759192@roeck-us.net> <20211228092140.GA26632@www.linux-watchdog.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20211228092140.GA26632@www.linux-watchdog.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 28 Dec 2021, Wim Van Sebroeck wrote: > Hi Lee, > > > On Tue, 07 Dec 2021, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > > > On 12/7/21 2:03 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > > > [ ... ] > > > > > It sounded to me like Lee wanted an immutable branch for that > > > > > > > > Not exactly, I said: > > > > > > > > "> Suppose we should take patch #2 via [Watchdog] as well. > > > > > > > > If that happens, I would like a PR to an immutable branch." > > > > > > > > The alternative is that I take the patch and provide an immutable > > > > branch to you, which I am in a position to do. > > > > > > > > > > I understand, only I am not in a position to take it since my tree > > > isn't the official watchdog-next tree, and it doesn't show up in -next. > > > If Wim takes it into the official watchdog-next tree or not would be > > > completely up to him. > > > > > > I personally don't care if the bindings check is clean in my inofficial > > > tree, so maybe this is a non-issue. > > > > That doesn't help, sadly. > > > > I think the best course of action is for Wim to let me know when this > > patch makes it into his tree. I'll take the MFD one at the same time > > and the two shall meet in -next. > > > > Honestly, this is all such a faff. > > > > Just to keep a script happy that 3 people care about. > > It's going in today. Also applied. Thanks Wim. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog