From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
maciej.szmigiero@oracle.com,
"moderated list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR ARM64 (KVM/arm64)"
<kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>,
"open list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR MIPS (KVM/mips)"
<linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR MIPS (KVM/mips)"
<kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR RISC-V (KVM/riscv)"
<kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
Peter Feiner <pfeiner@google.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 19/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Zap collapsible SPTEs in shadow MMU at all possible levels
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 17:01:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yqyzavjp9eS9p4+m@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220516232138.1783324-20-dmatlack@google.com>
On Mon, May 16, 2022, David Matlack wrote:
> Currently KVM only zaps collapsible 4KiB SPTEs in the shadow MMU. This
> is fine for now since KVM never creates intermediate huge pages during
> dirty logging. In other words, KVM always replaces 1GiB pages directly
> with 4KiB pages, so there is no reason to look for collapsible 2MiB
> pages.
>
> However, this will stop being true once the shadow MMU participates in
> eager page splitting. During eager page splitting, each 1GiB is first
> split into 2MiB pages and then those are split into 4KiB pages. The
> intermediate 2MiB pages may be left behind if an error condition causes
> eager page splitting to bail early.
>
> No functional change intended.
>
> Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 21 ++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> index f83de72feeac..a5d96d452f42 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> @@ -6177,18 +6177,25 @@ static bool kvm_mmu_zap_collapsible_spte(struct kvm *kvm,
> return need_tlb_flush;
> }
>
> +static void kvm_rmap_zap_collapsible_sptes(struct kvm *kvm,
> + const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
> +{
> + /*
> + * Note, use KVM_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL - 1 since there's no need to zap
> + * pages that are already mapped at the maximum possible level.
> + */
> + if (slot_handle_level(kvm, slot, kvm_mmu_zap_collapsible_spte,
> + PG_LEVEL_4K, KVM_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL - 1,
> + true))
No need to wrap, "true" fits easily on the previous line. That said, I don't see
any point in adding a helper. It's highly unlike there will be another caller,
and IMO it's not any more readable since I have to go look at another function
when reading kvm_mmu_zap_collapsible_sptes().
With some gentle massaging, the comment can squeeze onto two lines even with the
extra level of indentation.
/*
* Note, use KVM_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL - 1, there's no need to zap
* pages that are already mapped at the maximum hugepage level.
*/
if (slot_handle_level(kvm, slot, kvm_mmu_zap_collapsible_spte,
PG_LEVEL_4K, KVM_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL - 1, true)
kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs_memslot(kvm, slot);
> + kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs_memslot(kvm, slot);
> +}
> +
> void kvm_mmu_zap_collapsible_sptes(struct kvm *kvm,
> const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
> {
> if (kvm_memslots_have_rmaps(kvm)) {
> write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> - /*
> - * Zap only 4k SPTEs since the legacy MMU only supports dirty
> - * logging at a 4k granularity and never creates collapsible
> - * 2m SPTEs during dirty logging.
> - */
> - if (slot_handle_level_4k(kvm, slot, kvm_mmu_zap_collapsible_spte, true))
> - kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs_memslot(kvm, slot);
> + kvm_rmap_zap_collapsible_sptes(kvm, slot);
> write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> }
>
> --
> 2.36.0.550.gb090851708-goog
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-17 17:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-16 23:21 [PATCH v6 00/22] KVM: Extend Eager Page Splitting to the shadow MMU David Matlack
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 01/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Optimize MMU page cache lookup for all direct SPs David Matlack
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 02/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Use a bool for direct David Matlack
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 03/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Stop passing @direct to mmu_alloc_root() David Matlack
2022-06-16 18:47 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-22 14:06 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-06-22 14:19 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 04/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Derive shadow MMU page role from parent David Matlack
2022-06-17 1:19 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-17 15:12 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 05/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Always pass 0 for @quadrant when gptes are 8 bytes David Matlack
2022-06-17 15:20 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 06/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Decompose kvm_mmu_get_page() into separate functions David Matlack
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 07/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Consolidate shadow page allocation and initialization David Matlack
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 08/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Rename shadow MMU functions that deal with shadow pages David Matlack
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 09/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Move guest PT write-protection to account_shadowed() David Matlack
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 10/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Pass memory caches to allocate SPs separately David Matlack
2022-06-17 15:01 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-21 17:06 ` David Matlack
2022-06-21 17:27 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 11/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Replace vcpu with kvm in kvm_mmu_alloc_shadow_page() David Matlack
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 12/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Pass kvm pointer separately from vcpu to kvm_mmu_find_shadow_page() David Matlack
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 13/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Allow NULL @vcpu in kvm_mmu_find_shadow_page() David Matlack
2022-06-17 15:28 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-22 14:26 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 14/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Pass const memslot to rmap_add() David Matlack
2022-06-17 15:30 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 15/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Decouple rmap_add() and link_shadow_page() from kvm_vcpu David Matlack
2022-06-17 16:39 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 16/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Update page stats in __rmap_add() David Matlack
2022-06-17 16:40 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 17/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Cache the access bits of shadowed translations David Matlack
2022-06-17 16:53 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 18/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Extend make_huge_page_split_spte() for the shadow MMU David Matlack
2022-06-17 16:56 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 19/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Zap collapsible SPTEs in shadow MMU at all possible levels David Matlack
2022-06-17 17:01 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2022-06-21 17:24 ` David Matlack
2022-06-21 17:59 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 20/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Refactor drop_large_spte() David Matlack
2022-06-17 17:11 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-22 16:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-06-22 16:50 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 21/22] KVM: Allow for different capacities in kvm_mmu_memory_cache structs David Matlack
2022-05-19 15:33 ` Anup Patel
2022-05-20 23:21 ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-05-23 17:37 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-23 17:44 ` David Matlack
2022-05-23 18:13 ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-05-23 18:22 ` David Matlack
2022-05-23 23:53 ` David Matlack
2022-06-17 17:41 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-17 18:34 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 22/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Extend Eager Page Splitting to nested MMUs David Matlack
2022-06-01 21:50 ` Ricardo Koller
2022-06-17 19:08 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yqyzavjp9eS9p4+m@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=bgardon@google.com \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.szmigiero@oracle.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=pfeiner@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).