From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-mips-owner@vger.kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32786EB64DD
	for <linux-mips@archiver.kernel.org>; Fri, 21 Jul 2023 18:25:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S229552AbjGUSZA (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-mips@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 21 Jul 2023 14:25:00 -0400
Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36092 "EHLO
        lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S229644AbjGUSZA (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>); Fri, 21 Jul 2023 14:25:00 -0400
Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1])
        by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 554FE3A80;
        Fri, 21 Jul 2023 11:24:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140])
        (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
         key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
        (No client certificate requested)
        by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DED6361D5F;
        Fri, 21 Jul 2023 18:24:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 30C25C433C8;
        Fri, 21 Jul 2023 18:24:35 +0000 (UTC)
Date:   Fri, 21 Jul 2023 19:24:34 +0100
From:   Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To:     Yicong Yang <yangyicong@huawei.com>
Cc:     akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, x86@kernel.org,
        mark.rutland@arm.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
        anshuman.khandual@arm.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        corbet@lwn.net, peterz@infradead.org, arnd@arndb.de,
        punit.agrawal@bytedance.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        darren@os.amperecomputing.com, yangyicong@hisilicon.com,
        huzhanyuan@oppo.com, lipeifeng@oppo.com, zhangshiming@oppo.com,
        guojian@oppo.com, realmz6@gmail.com, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
        openrisc@lists.librecores.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
        linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
        Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com,
        xhao@linux.alibaba.com, prime.zeng@hisilicon.com,
        Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 3/4] mm/tlbbatch: Introduce
 arch_flush_tlb_batched_pending()
Message-ID: <ZLrNYtekYsMFZuVK@arm.com>
References: <20230717131004.12662-1-yangyicong@huawei.com>
 <20230717131004.12662-4-yangyicong@huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230717131004.12662-4-yangyicong@huawei.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-mips.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 09:10:03PM +0800, Yicong Yang wrote:
> From: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@hisilicon.com>
> 
> Currently we'll flush the mm in flush_tlb_batched_pending() to
> avoid race between reclaim unmaps pages by batched TLB flush
> and mprotect/munmap/etc. Other architectures like arm64 may
> only need a synchronization barrier(dsb) here rather than
> a full mm flush. So add arch_flush_tlb_batched_pending() to
> allow an arch-specific implementation here. This intends no
> functional changes on x86 since still a full mm flush for
> x86.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@hisilicon.com>

Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>