From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>
Cc: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>,
Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>,
Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>,
Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@google.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>,
Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 05/14] KVM: Allow range-based TLB invalidation from common code
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2023 15:30:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZNv8cCzI9fMWkGWT@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230811045127.3308641-6-rananta@google.com>
On Fri, Aug 11, 2023, Raghavendra Rao Ananta wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> index ec169f5c7dce2..00f7bda9202f2 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> @@ -278,16 +278,14 @@ static inline bool kvm_available_flush_remote_tlbs_range(void)
> return kvm_x86_ops.flush_remote_tlbs_range;
> }
>
> -void kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_range(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t start_gfn,
> - gfn_t nr_pages)
> +int kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs_range(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn, u64 nr_pages)
> {
> int ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
> if (kvm_x86_ops.flush_remote_tlbs_range)
> - ret = static_call(kvm_x86_flush_remote_tlbs_range)(kvm, start_gfn,
> - nr_pages);
> - if (ret)
> - kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
> + ret = static_call(kvm_x86_flush_remote_tlbs_range)(kvm, gfn, nr_pages);
> +
> + return ret;
Please write this as
if (kvm_x86_ops.flush_remote_tlbs_range)
return static_call(kvm_x86_flush_remote_tlbs_range)(kvm, gfn, nr_pages);
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
or alternatively
if (!kvm_x86_ops.flush_remote_tlbs_range)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
return static_call(kvm_x86_flush_remote_tlbs_range)(kvm, gfn, nr_pages);
Hmm, I'll throw my official vote for the second version.
The local "ret" is unnecessary and is suprisingly dangerous. I screwed up the
conflict resolution when cherry-picking my CONFIG_HYPERV change to see what the
conflict looked like and ended up with a double flush:
int ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
if (kvm_x86_ops.flush_remote_tlbs_range)
ret = static_call(kvm_x86_flush_remote_tlbs_range)(kvm, gfn, nr_pages);
if (ret)
kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
return ret;
Dropping "ret" makes it much harder to get trigger happy when resolving conflicts.
No need for a new version to fix the above, assuming Marc/Oliver is ok doing
fixup when applying.
Nit aside, looks good for x86, and I know of no conflicts, so take 'er away!
Acked-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-15 22:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-11 4:51 [PATCH v9 00/14] KVM: arm64: Add support for FEAT_TLBIRANGE Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-08-11 4:51 ` [PATCH v9 01/14] KVM: Rename kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlb() to kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs() Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-08-15 22:30 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-11 4:51 ` [PATCH v9 02/14] KVM: Declare kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs() globally Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-08-11 4:51 ` [PATCH v9 03/14] KVM: arm64: Use kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs() Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-08-11 4:51 ` [PATCH v9 04/14] KVM: Remove CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_ARCH_TLB_FLUSH_ALL Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-08-11 4:51 ` [PATCH v9 05/14] KVM: Allow range-based TLB invalidation from common code Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-08-15 22:30 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2023-08-17 8:39 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-08-11 4:51 ` [PATCH v9 06/14] KVM: Move kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs_memslot() to " Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-08-15 22:31 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-11 4:51 ` [PATCH v9 07/14] arm64: tlb: Refactor the core flush algorithm of __flush_tlb_range Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-08-11 4:51 ` [PATCH v9 08/14] arm64: tlb: Implement __flush_s2_tlb_range_op() Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-08-11 4:51 ` [PATCH v9 09/14] KVM: arm64: Implement __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_range() Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-08-11 4:51 ` [PATCH v9 10/14] KVM: arm64: Define kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_range() Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-08-11 4:51 ` [PATCH v9 11/14] KVM: arm64: Implement kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs_range() Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-08-11 4:51 ` [PATCH v9 12/14] KVM: arm64: Flush only the memslot after write-protect Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-08-11 4:51 ` [PATCH v9 13/14] KVM: arm64: Invalidate the table entries upon a range Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-08-11 4:51 ` [PATCH v9 14/14] KVM: arm64: Use TLBI range-based instructions for unmap Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-08-14 23:16 ` [PATCH v9 00/14] KVM: arm64: Add support for FEAT_TLBIRANGE Sean Christopherson
2023-08-15 0:29 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-08-15 0:52 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-15 17:11 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-08-15 17:15 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-17 9:29 ` Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZNv8cCzI9fMWkGWT@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=atishp@atishpatra.org \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=coltonlewis@google.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jingzhangos@google.com \
--cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rananta@google.com \
--cc=reijiw@google.com \
--cc=shahuang@redhat.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).