From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
To: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
Dengcheng Zhu <dzhu@wavecomp.com>,
John Crispin <john@phrozen.org>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Qais Yousef <qyousef@layalina.io>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: vpe-mt: provide a default 'physical_memsize'
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 22:59:35 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a2a7806b-ba53-9f37-938b-d3f48ea217f2@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7a2eca01-8420-dd98-9d4d-edf192f099fb@linaro.org>
Hi,
On 2/13/23 23:40, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Hi Randy,
>
> On 14/2/23 02:09, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> When neither LANTIQ nor MIPS_MALTA is set, 'physical_memsize' is not
>> declared. This causes the build to fail with:
>>
>> mips-linux-ld: arch/mips/kernel/vpe-mt.o: in function `vpe_run':
>> arch/mips/kernel/vpe-mt.c:(.text.vpe_run+0x280): undefined reference to `physical_memsize'
>>
>> Fix this by declaring a 0-value physical_memsize with neither LANTIQ
>> nor MIPS_MALTA is set, like LANTIQ does.
>>
>> Fixes: 1a2a6d7e8816 ("MIPS: APRP: Split VPE loader into separate files.")
>> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/202302030625.2g3E98sY-lkp@intel.com/
>> Cc: Dengcheng Zhu <dzhu@wavecomp.com>
>> Cc: John Crispin <john@phrozen.org>
>> Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
>> Cc: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org
>> ---
>> How has this build error not been detected for 10 years?
>>
>> arch/mips/kernel/vpe-mt.c | 9 +++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff -- a/arch/mips/kernel/vpe-mt.c b/arch/mips/kernel/vpe-mt.c
>> --- a/arch/mips/kernel/vpe-mt.c
>> +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/vpe-mt.c
>> @@ -22,6 +22,15 @@ static int major;
>> /* The number of TCs and VPEs physically available on the core */
>> static int hw_tcs, hw_vpes;
>> +#if !defined(CONFIG_MIPS_MALTA) && !defined(CONFIG_LANTIQ)
>> +/* The 2 above provide their own 'physical_memsize' variable. */
>
> Which seems dubious. The variable should be defined once, likely in
> arch/mips/kernel/vpe-mt.c, since arch/mips/include/asm/vpe.h declares
> it.
That doesn't work for CONFIG_MIPS_MALTA=y and MIPS_VPE_LOADER is not set.
In the current (before a consolidation patch) code, mti-malta/malta-memory.c declares
'physical_memsize' and malta-dtshim.c uses it (thru an 'extern'), so
MIPS_VPE_LOADER and MIPS_VPE_LOADER_MT are not required to be enabled.
> I'm surprised CONFIG_MIPS_MALTA always links malta-dtshim.o, but
> malta-dtshim.o depends on MIPS_VPE_LOADER_MT, and I can't find a
> CONFIG_MIPS_MALTA -> MIPS_VPE_LOADER_MT Kconfig dep.
Why does malta-dtshim.o depend on MIPS_VPE_LOADER_MT?
MIPS_MALTA selects SUPPORTS_VPE_LOADER and SYS_SUPPORTS_MULTITHREADING
but does not require MIPS_VPE_LOADER or MIPS_VPE_LOADER_MT.
It builds fine with those symbols being enabled (before any patch).
>> +/*
>> + * This is needed by the vpe-mt loader code, just set it to 0 and assume
>> + * that the firmware hardcodes this value to something useful.
>> + */
>> +unsigned long physical_memsize = 0L;
>
> I agree this is where this variable has be be declared / initialized,
> but having this dependent on CONFIG_MIPS_MALTA/CONFIG_LANTIQ machines
> doesn't seem right.
So far I have been able to consolidate the LANTIQ code into a general
patch, but not MALTA.
>> +#endif
>> +
>> /* We are prepared so configure and start the VPE... */
>> int vpe_run(struct vpe *v)
>> {
>
> Regards,
>
> Phil.
Thanks.
--
~Randy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-16 6:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-14 1:09 [PATCH] MIPS: vpe-mt: provide a default 'physical_memsize' Randy Dunlap
2023-02-14 7:40 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-02-14 18:29 ` Randy Dunlap
2023-02-16 6:59 ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
2023-02-17 11:57 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2023-02-17 20:04 ` Randy Dunlap
2023-02-17 23:24 ` Randy Dunlap
2023-02-19 8:40 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a2a7806b-ba53-9f37-938b-d3f48ea217f2@infradead.org \
--to=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=dzhu@wavecomp.com \
--cc=john@phrozen.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qyousef@layalina.io \
--cc=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox