From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1834825B30C; Fri, 13 Jun 2025 10:39:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.10 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1749811153; cv=none; b=J2CKboSAzoKohBM6ovL1hSoJEUvsxY7vXnMNL/Kpt06EVSgYlBbZTchMxATu6s2oACB37MSyOlCQfM89Anf3G7jjf+BnrI2AWrXqMU3TerYImHOiyMqxIsXedNgH7yjr8UhLcl5rPtEOoEuUmZaQNtwcTZE9je1LjqSNIdG6kng= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1749811153; c=relaxed/simple; bh=lTnmuJ4Zw3G9dBvu7NKjvEJCyXHzKDQ65nEqpiNtDFo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=CY5OIvqZg3QXWZWVJ+Kqxqm44tukEUjHOBvygeU6q/RIA24A6LSg9QMdiOOv2YZYvMCBkRdQpSQpGnF5Da50+7bKK9kOZvF4JULTKkWxN/TRrl0Gs/V0RLd+WCgkzk1/ZrmwdCXflyTmfb3m66DEVJYLYgegpDlUsuesstlaEkg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=ISfiiyr2; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.10 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="ISfiiyr2" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1749811152; x=1781347152; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=lTnmuJ4Zw3G9dBvu7NKjvEJCyXHzKDQ65nEqpiNtDFo=; b=ISfiiyr2K+jMxxDWgM+dxw9NOjBxUPzwe+CgNrH5OuKFMhuNDOE2Ks0D 9zVpqWBR/cjCDbLFIIDZdXHIb74Ju5QiIFNrfcSTuBSR1deRe8CUNFEUs v3PHG+vroJWXRZmD7RLcwGzthePlAIGiU+T5hmxyx8UVis+ruOhjjrQRC oJOZaPhL2MWVyuWe24YXaN1lYvdb6tm9zQvaXN/ksR3thP3tfQ6uSLwvi XVPTC8ehz4zvadBt4m53fI43Cr65Bxmbzv4qVg06/eAcHpSNBWjb9YI4s OUGqL614yxXEy+qtXY8Rm0Gvm1WppmYdF1T3VfZo6zWQVRcN2mvIlx6Al A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: beQ8ftboT4aRlwvmqmDqew== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 6LtwW3ypQ6eN2MoLlbsZxA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11462"; a="63375282" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.16,233,1744095600"; d="scan'208";a="63375282" Received: from fmviesa009.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.149]) by fmvoesa104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Jun 2025 03:39:11 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: rEJYELCnQN2xerUUmvLz7g== X-CSE-MsgGUID: RmyrZvILRR6G+bZEy6+kkg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.16,233,1744095600"; d="scan'208";a="148681207" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.52]) by fmviesa009.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Jun 2025 03:39:10 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uQ1oR-00000006DOa-32d4; Fri, 13 Jun 2025 13:39:07 +0300 Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 13:39:07 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer , Bartosz Golaszewski Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] MIPS: Alchemy: Remove unused forward declaration Message-ID: References: <20250531194346.3630898-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250531194346.3630898-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo +Cc: Bart. On Sat, May 31, 2025 at 10:43:46PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > The 'struct gpio' is not used in the code, remove unneeded forward declaration. > This seems to be a leftover for a 5 years. Any comments on this, please? It prevents us from moving forward with the killing the GPIO legacy APIs (it's not critical at all in this case, just an inconvenience for a `grep`, but still...). I think we can take it via GPIO tree if there is no reply. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko