From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52ABC1CFBC; Fri, 13 Jun 2025 12:49:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.14 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1749818988; cv=none; b=XF25jiE8wyjtMaF9kA3S6MnRxTTS8tPTJz5hTFx5g/2Wt+3bHjP1KrxAveFSwLsB1Al5R9LfHziac+uqVBEmmPl2G/i/T2l3yIZm+sHoT1gnvEQyk4gF1IBqU5ZXroHEyf0o4NEszhvqGFScJz24huOHbWDHr7gGAK1H7Pr8Mkg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1749818988; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ek/eN2D8taHMBYdQGwF6lG7+XsxcXMWy1Zxnj0njFgo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=IhzBA6zjQKmctB0neRY+uI7vamtdd0dwZEsrmCHwm1jY3mCNTxX/oETKjf4H9vPJlxhrGdsLkzhCPfGisSwkkFO0wl8QqIBUfh6hmoAZ9ejPRfhMMzSx5CAGXWQ59JGJFckQLwcxRCgCb4sqdwlO7V0t4Rl/mxwRLBw8+eoJXxE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=P0yxx6Kr; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.14 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="P0yxx6Kr" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1749818986; x=1781354986; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=ek/eN2D8taHMBYdQGwF6lG7+XsxcXMWy1Zxnj0njFgo=; b=P0yxx6KrtEzbp/K7lnka5kEka65c2+Ev5R24SDE7p4EeVsPjw4YwRYYo aX69dq16Y9/qhoSfOmzOsQF12UFK2ckMESXxKZ5Rg3uhiE5kYSsChGw5s v4utGmmJEhBbG+OWZ74SPnHhv6mpFgj5ECdfX5N26pRH06QbPfblNntDh oC4hxl+rLmF/5DTUPxNycY0Aow+j60pACo45RV4ZKNrU6k2HHELhLc/VR nOXXlGCibeuW2n2Br34to1Pextxa6JpIIQX8LlGzzNZCYppvW8x7KvBno PmCuuYqEL9s36BORXmLKSr9qFY4BRvkc3B8OlxQHFbKtcXJvFvbWHDSu6 A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: D1hTrai7TlmuiJqrf+j0sQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: OGgHy8otSDaSOOClHeMxSA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11463"; a="52127887" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.16,233,1744095600"; d="scan'208";a="52127887" Received: from fmviesa003.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.143]) by fmvoesa108.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Jun 2025 05:49:45 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: HZy3oaWCQDiPIbH3D8Vs+Q== X-CSE-MsgGUID: n6gVM+05RPivmmFQPEPW6w== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.16,233,1744095600"; d="scan'208";a="151641284" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.52]) by fmviesa003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Jun 2025 05:49:44 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uQ3qo-00000006FPu-0Csj; Fri, 13 Jun 2025 15:49:42 +0300 Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 15:49:41 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Thomas Bogendoerfer Cc: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Bartosz Golaszewski Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] MIPS: Alchemy: Remove unused forward declaration Message-ID: References: <20250531194346.3630898-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 01:31:33PM +0200, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote: > On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 01:39:07PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > +Cc: Bart. > > > > On Sat, May 31, 2025 at 10:43:46PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > The 'struct gpio' is not used in the code, remove unneeded forward declaration. > > > This seems to be a leftover for a 5 years. > > > > Any comments on this, please? > > looks good Formal tag please? > > It prevents us from moving forward with the killing the GPIO legacy APIs > > (it's not critical at all in this case, just an inconvenience for a `grep`, > > but still...). > > > > I think we can take it via GPIO tree if there is no reply. > > please do Acked-by? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko