* [PATCH] MIPS: Alchemy: Remove bogus static/inline specifiers
@ 2025-10-29 15:03 Thierry Reding
2025-11-07 12:09 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Thierry Reding @ 2025-10-29 15:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Bogendoerfer; +Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes, linux-mips, linux-kernel
From: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
The recent io_remap_pfn_range() rework applied the static and inline
specifiers to the implementation of io_remap_pfn_range_pfn() on MIPS
Alchemy, mirroring the same change on other platforms. However, this
function is defined in a source file and that definition causes a
conflict with its declaration. Fix this by dropping the specifiers.
Fixes: 8efb51ad1b05 ("mm: abstract io_remap_pfn_range() based on PFN")
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
---
arch/mips/alchemy/common/setup.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/mips/alchemy/common/setup.c b/arch/mips/alchemy/common/setup.c
index c35b4f809d51..992134a8c23a 100644
--- a/arch/mips/alchemy/common/setup.c
+++ b/arch/mips/alchemy/common/setup.c
@@ -94,8 +94,7 @@ phys_addr_t fixup_bigphys_addr(phys_addr_t phys_addr, phys_addr_t size)
return phys_addr;
}
-static inline unsigned long io_remap_pfn_range_pfn(unsigned long pfn,
- unsigned long size)
+unsigned long io_remap_pfn_range_pfn(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long size)
{
phys_addr_t phys_addr = fixup_bigphys_addr(pfn << PAGE_SHIFT, size);
--
2.51.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Alchemy: Remove bogus static/inline specifiers
2025-10-29 15:03 [PATCH] MIPS: Alchemy: Remove bogus static/inline specifiers Thierry Reding
@ 2025-11-07 12:09 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2025-12-08 18:16 ` Florian Fainelli
2025-12-15 17:17 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Bogendoerfer @ 2025-11-07 12:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thierry Reding; +Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes, linux-mips, linux-kernel
On Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 04:03:16PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> From: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
>
> The recent io_remap_pfn_range() rework applied the static and inline
> specifiers to the implementation of io_remap_pfn_range_pfn() on MIPS
> Alchemy, mirroring the same change on other platforms. However, this
> function is defined in a source file and that definition causes a
> conflict with its declaration. Fix this by dropping the specifiers.
>
> Fixes: 8efb51ad1b05 ("mm: abstract io_remap_pfn_range() based on PFN")
I guess this patch should be applied to the tree, where this commit
is in.
> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
--
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Alchemy: Remove bogus static/inline specifiers
2025-10-29 15:03 [PATCH] MIPS: Alchemy: Remove bogus static/inline specifiers Thierry Reding
2025-11-07 12:09 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
@ 2025-12-08 18:16 ` Florian Fainelli
2025-12-10 16:38 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2025-12-15 17:17 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2025-12-08 18:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thierry Reding, Thomas Bogendoerfer
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes, linux-mips, linux-kernel
On 10/29/25 08:03, Thierry Reding wrote:
> From: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
>
> The recent io_remap_pfn_range() rework applied the static and inline
> specifiers to the implementation of io_remap_pfn_range_pfn() on MIPS
> Alchemy, mirroring the same change on other platforms. However, this
> function is defined in a source file and that definition causes a
> conflict with its declaration. Fix this by dropping the specifiers.
>
> Fixes: 8efb51ad1b05 ("mm: abstract io_remap_pfn_range() based on PFN")
> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Thanks!
Thomas, can you pick this up so we have working alchemy builds again?
Thanks!
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Alchemy: Remove bogus static/inline specifiers
2025-12-08 18:16 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2025-12-10 16:38 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2025-12-10 22:58 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Bogendoerfer @ 2025-12-10 16:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Florian Fainelli
Cc: Thierry Reding, Lorenzo Stoakes, linux-mips, linux-kernel
On Mon, Dec 08, 2025 at 10:16:29AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 10/29/25 08:03, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > From: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> >
> > The recent io_remap_pfn_range() rework applied the static and inline
> > specifiers to the implementation of io_remap_pfn_range_pfn() on MIPS
> > Alchemy, mirroring the same change on other platforms. However, this
> > function is defined in a source file and that definition causes a
> > conflict with its declaration. Fix this by dropping the specifiers.
> >
> > Fixes: 8efb51ad1b05 ("mm: abstract io_remap_pfn_range() based on PFN")
> > Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
>
> Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
>
> Thanks!
>
> Thomas, can you pick this up so we have working alchemy builds again?
well, I've acked the patch for inclusion in the tree where the broken
commit was applied, but I could take it.
I'll correct the Fixes tag to
Fixes: c707a68f9468 ("mm: abstract io_remap_pfn_range() based on PFN")
when applying.
Thomas.
--
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Alchemy: Remove bogus static/inline specifiers
2025-12-10 16:38 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
@ 2025-12-10 22:58 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Bogendoerfer @ 2025-12-10 22:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Florian Fainelli
Cc: Thierry Reding, Lorenzo Stoakes, linux-mips, linux-kernel
On Wed, Dec 10, 2025 at 05:38:52PM +0100, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2025 at 10:16:29AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> > On 10/29/25 08:03, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > From: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> > >
> > > The recent io_remap_pfn_range() rework applied the static and inline
> > > specifiers to the implementation of io_remap_pfn_range_pfn() on MIPS
> > > Alchemy, mirroring the same change on other platforms. However, this
> > > function is defined in a source file and that definition causes a
> > > conflict with its declaration. Fix this by dropping the specifiers.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 8efb51ad1b05 ("mm: abstract io_remap_pfn_range() based on PFN")
> > > Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> >
> > Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Thomas, can you pick this up so we have working alchemy builds again?
>
> well, I've acked the patch for inclusion in the tree where the broken
> commit was applied, but I could take it.
but this has to wait until -rc1, since the breaking commit is not
in my mips-next branch, yet (and mergign current upstream is not
an option there).
Thomas.
--
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Alchemy: Remove bogus static/inline specifiers
2025-10-29 15:03 [PATCH] MIPS: Alchemy: Remove bogus static/inline specifiers Thierry Reding
2025-11-07 12:09 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2025-12-08 18:16 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2025-12-15 17:17 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Bogendoerfer @ 2025-12-15 17:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thierry Reding; +Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes, linux-mips, linux-kernel
On Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 04:03:16PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> From: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
>
> The recent io_remap_pfn_range() rework applied the static and inline
> specifiers to the implementation of io_remap_pfn_range_pfn() on MIPS
> Alchemy, mirroring the same change on other platforms. However, this
> function is defined in a source file and that definition causes a
> conflict with its declaration. Fix this by dropping the specifiers.
>
> Fixes: 8efb51ad1b05 ("mm: abstract io_remap_pfn_range() based on PFN")
> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> ---
> arch/mips/alchemy/common/setup.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/mips/alchemy/common/setup.c b/arch/mips/alchemy/common/setup.c
> index c35b4f809d51..992134a8c23a 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/alchemy/common/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/mips/alchemy/common/setup.c
> @@ -94,8 +94,7 @@ phys_addr_t fixup_bigphys_addr(phys_addr_t phys_addr, phys_addr_t size)
> return phys_addr;
> }
>
> -static inline unsigned long io_remap_pfn_range_pfn(unsigned long pfn,
> - unsigned long size)
> +unsigned long io_remap_pfn_range_pfn(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long size)
> {
> phys_addr_t phys_addr = fixup_bigphys_addr(pfn << PAGE_SHIFT, size);
>
> --
> 2.51.0
applied to mips-fixes.
Thomas.
--
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-12-15 17:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-10-29 15:03 [PATCH] MIPS: Alchemy: Remove bogus static/inline specifiers Thierry Reding
2025-11-07 12:09 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2025-12-08 18:16 ` Florian Fainelli
2025-12-10 16:38 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2025-12-10 22:58 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2025-12-15 17:17 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).