From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E8692D77EE; Wed, 22 Apr 2026 20:32:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.17 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776889977; cv=none; b=r4kw6OZpmHM09rVrzzPAJeyTgOcvQ5j9RGS3Sk3ruPlsEx/397lGAAJXiythOeNx5rrlVaWMVUEJsCXR3m66jbmN1dHKaQcon/XMoF8X5dboXzQEPOTFYt80HstY90CEnVVp/Td5ka4oK9Ojb5Lxy782vwqxTqTv7FoMksvn/pk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776889977; c=relaxed/simple; bh=enn9A5uWXBDGWbSPr5HjILyXbuFGLgH23EtNAkqn9kU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=MUZhM3OvcuQpjOKvIh1586EDvMlcPTQycotUeG6fAUkvszFtbaNLA9w+y8MYq9214CqL/zJem/sc1sJz/nZFuOxe+4pQ1HC48WaQ9CSxDZQFqEb0INNBgKfOn/YlUJlAm5SBeSCM4J4E3wFAnJHTwwCOmgfCZ1Ui3MiovHZ92Eg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=dS5BPdfJ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.17 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="dS5BPdfJ" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1776889975; x=1808425975; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=enn9A5uWXBDGWbSPr5HjILyXbuFGLgH23EtNAkqn9kU=; b=dS5BPdfJgSEiLDxnKdmj+G6FRPjzD5K19sXyY7aCKbG1Vo2+Hlb9s06P sNJ0b+F1P0SDqQuZ+KaqRgjAZUxx0XP9Nszxz3pL2viTo3QNb2A3eC4oD gNc3gzxeErpeAwz9yjXo05XndSmEwnTEfWyqH4t42bubt7PJ9rKZfrnr3 W/3wUhMBtid+mkxEhQwc6B2LByhEhXilGl+Q5Y0o5VxH/nloAwje2ypWk Clf0UMqVne28kPsbPiGOi2RapQiRBoZRsiU7D+U4pQxKnU/+yxQPyA2Sa I9h0Qn0gufhj4+6v12AjtfGFwfwSuRwSYnGQLHrikMtOMs3APe/lZGWMc Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: vneAvToDQ6mld5IYNbPXYA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: dVeGBksnQsqQtv+c5CliSQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11764"; a="77835430" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,193,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="77835430" Received: from fmviesa009.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.149]) by orvoesa109.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Apr 2026 13:32:55 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: W7RT61V5QOGsOgxgMIOXJg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: p/rjs6SfSle3venrugbXFg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,193,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="225942202" Received: from smoticic-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.245.201]) by fmviesa009-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Apr 2026 13:32:52 -0700 Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2026 23:32:50 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Sergey Shtylyov Cc: Felipe Ribeiro de Souza , andy@kernel.org, dlechner@baylibre.com, jic23@kernel.org, nuno.sa@analog.com, paul@crapouillou.net, Lucas Ivars Cadima Ciziks , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] iio: adc: ingenic-adc: refactor ingenic_adc_read_chan_info_raw() Message-ID: References: <20260421221629.70401-1-felipers@ime.usp.br> <20260421221629.70401-2-felipers@ime.usp.br> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Wed, Apr 22, 2026 at 04:28:24PM +0300, Sergey Shtylyov wrote: > On 4/22/26 11:41 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: [...] > >> + dev_err(iio_dev->dev.parent, "Failed to enable clock: %d\n", > >> + ret); > > > > Make it a single line. It's fine to go a bit over 80 for readability purposes. > > And BTW the new checkpatch limit is 100 columns. :-) Yes. But checkpatch has lower priority over documentation. Documentation clearly says 80 and IIO tries to follow this. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko