From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Thu, 10 Apr 2014 01:03:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]:50428 "EHLO localhost.localdomain" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S6832653AbaDIXDOepRSm (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Apr 2014 01:03:14 +0200 Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 00:03:14 +0100 (BST) From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" To: Jonas Gorski cc: Paul Bolle , Ralf Baechle , MIPS Mailing List , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Replace CONFIG_MIPS64 and CONFIG_MIPS32_R2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1391952745.25424.6.camel@x220> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (LFD 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 39751 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: macro@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: linux-mips X-List-ID: linux-mips List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-mips On Sun, 9 Feb 2014, Jonas Gorski wrote: > While I agree about the CONFIG_MIPS64 => CONFIG_64BIT replacement, I > wonder if CONFIG_MIPS32_R2 shouldn't rather be CONFIG_CPU_MIPSR2 > (maybe even the existing CONFIG_CPU_MIPS32_R2 are wrong here). Absolutely. You should be able to build a 32-bit kernel (32BIT) for a MIPS64r2 processor (CPU_MIPS64_R2) and use the FP64 feature. Maciej