From: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
To: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>,
Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>,
Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>,
Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@google.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 02/14] KVM: Declare kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs() globally
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2023 14:00:15 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c33b0518-6e64-7acf-efa8-f404fce1ccac@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230808231330.3855936-3-rananta@google.com>
On 8/9/23 09:13, Raghavendra Rao Ananta wrote:
> There's no reason for the architectures to declare
> kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs() in their own headers. Hence to
> avoid this duplication, make the declaration global, leaving
> the architectures to define only __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_FLUSH_REMOTE_TLBS
> as needed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>
> ---
> arch/mips/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 -
> include/linux/kvm_host.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 9b0ad8f3bf327..54a85f1d4f2c8 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -897,6 +897,5 @@ static inline void kvm_arch_vcpu_blocking(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
> static inline void kvm_arch_vcpu_unblocking(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
>
> #define __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_FLUSH_REMOTE_TLBS
> -int kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs(struct kvm *kvm);
>
> #endif /* __MIPS_KVM_HOST_H__ */
> diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> index e3f968b38ae97..ade5d4500c2ce 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> @@ -1484,6 +1484,8 @@ static inline int kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs(struct kvm *kvm)
> {
> return -ENOTSUPP;
> }
> +#else
> +int kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs(struct kvm *kvm);
> #endif
>
> #ifdef __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_NONCOHERENT_DMA
Is the declaration inconsistent to that in arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h?
In order to keep them consistent, I guess we need move kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs()
from x86's header file to arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c and 'inline' needs to be dropped.
Thanks,
Gavin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-09 4:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-08 23:13 [PATCH v8 00/14] KVM: arm64: Add support for FEAT_TLBIRANGE Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-08-08 23:13 ` [PATCH v8 01/14] KVM: Rename kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlb() to kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs() Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-08-08 23:13 ` [PATCH v8 02/14] KVM: Declare kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs() globally Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-08-09 4:00 ` Gavin Shan [this message]
2023-08-09 16:38 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-08-10 12:26 ` Shaoqin Huang
2023-08-10 20:54 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-08-10 22:20 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-10 22:34 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-08-10 23:04 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-11 4:09 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-08-11 3:18 ` Shaoqin Huang
2023-08-08 23:13 ` [PATCH v8 03/14] KVM: arm64: Use kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs() Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-08-09 4:10 ` Gavin Shan
2023-08-08 23:13 ` [PATCH v8 04/14] KVM: Remove CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_ARCH_TLB_FLUSH_ALL Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-08-09 4:11 ` Gavin Shan
2023-08-10 9:04 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-08-08 23:13 ` [PATCH v8 05/14] KVM: Allow range-based TLB invalidation from common code Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-08-09 6:09 ` Gavin Shan
2023-08-09 16:41 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-08-08 23:13 ` [PATCH v8 06/14] KVM: Move kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs_memslot() to " Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-08-08 23:13 ` [PATCH v8 07/14] arm64: tlb: Refactor the core flush algorithm of __flush_tlb_range Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-08-08 23:13 ` [PATCH v8 08/14] arm64: tlb: Implement __flush_s2_tlb_range_op() Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-08-11 3:16 ` Shaoqin Huang
2023-08-08 23:13 ` [PATCH v8 09/14] KVM: arm64: Implement __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_range() Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-08-09 0:43 ` Gavin Shan
2023-08-11 3:15 ` Shaoqin Huang
2023-08-08 23:13 ` [PATCH v8 10/14] KVM: arm64: Define kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_range() Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-08-08 23:13 ` [PATCH v8 11/14] KVM: arm64: Implement kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs_range() Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-08-10 1:40 ` kernel test robot
2023-08-11 3:03 ` Shaoqin Huang
2023-08-08 23:13 ` [PATCH v8 12/14] KVM: arm64: Flush only the memslot after write-protect Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-08-08 23:13 ` [PATCH v8 13/14] KVM: arm64: Invalidate the table entries upon a range Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-08-08 23:13 ` [PATCH v8 14/14] KVM: arm64: Use TLBI range-based intructions for unmap Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-08-11 3:13 ` Shaoqin Huang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c33b0518-6e64-7acf-efa8-f404fce1ccac@redhat.com \
--to=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=atishp@atishpatra.org \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=coltonlewis@google.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jingzhangos@google.com \
--cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rananta@google.com \
--cc=reijiw@google.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).