From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Fri, 25 Aug 2017 23:21:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-wm0-x234.google.com ([IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::234]:35373 "EHLO mail-wm0-x234.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S23993457AbdHYVVn1yhh7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Aug 2017 23:21:43 +0200 Received: by mail-wm0-x234.google.com with SMTP id y71so735387wmd.0; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 14:21:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=to:from:subject:cc:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OFQVyhwjl01oFLmjqn5ZjP5k03XbK4PXM16cyy9YYGU=; b=PVXSrThW56ctQNupcY71/G6fgQzr0cL/rET3oYD/D8D2U3333bkiWpqScFKHJHauLl SHTT8simitpj/KhJAUqQo+hE/0Z82QH7iB+XhMoo2D1EsCHWybeNCz0u7ghvDHWdqdra W05Yi5HdIYxszSQT5vYPsymCen/wkN8sdy4G0er7XhfoMAMDHFEMzzSos0nYESGZzv9I s1KzGI3808RidUEGM68RdZjP7on+gVDo/x+1sGse1M0bh8DuNVX/3k5i9nVHw8EJ13N9 Q/2UFVYE/PBdLg7uEbXWdCpb3oPWYU9lOvUs9E54qRhaHwJSJHmsTPEct7T7dbKPOREn hAFg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:subject:cc:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OFQVyhwjl01oFLmjqn5ZjP5k03XbK4PXM16cyy9YYGU=; b=b+vtA2JJbRoms9gV99ZM9oyceKmBoMtOmH3rhQZ/mnxP1SUcldHRRXPMMnN6bXkNqO e7336ZS6JEiG+756EQ8uyFrUh3VhC2FYJ7sLgXx1zNrje4ypcM2Q6GUNNajBupml9B2c i5fhyCOVHRojNfqdc8b32N1Q4ZaEqSsYIcb6yW7QbCrprVpPCGkEC7A2CP4rx40kdBQl mdOrXbjPMiYO6bdeZxx+VfTGypNSxr7EWlr1usVHGAcffnaxU15xEE03XpEQE+Ax6gmc lMyGP/R4FLL3MyBESCsutiPnNAJ/5JQffre3RyynBYIoJCa5MQdpqK9JQQnAYZZPf26k 0ApQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5iXJFxDMemeDQoKPk/2aPjmeezYk9XkGEINVTnR9jVJeObeOJJM YBxEmm5zTO3PZw== X-Received: by 10.28.213.203 with SMTP id m194mr314874wmg.41.1503696096961; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 14:21:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.112.156.244] ([192.19.255.250]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id k9sm3854018wrc.93.2017.08.25.14.21.35 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 25 Aug 2017 14:21:36 -0700 (PDT) To: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, ralf@linux-mips.org From: Florian Fainelli Subject: Maintenance of Linux/MIPS? Cc: john@phrozen.org, david.daney@cavium.com Message-ID: Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 14:21:33 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 59803 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: f.fainelli@gmail.com Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: linux-mips X-List-ID: linux-mips List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-mips Hi, There are a lot of patches at https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/project/linux-mips/list/ that appear to be under the "New" state and have not had a chance to be reviewed yet. What can we do to help speed up the review process, do we need more reviewers? It seems like most patches affecting Linux/MIPS are still core MIPS kernel changes, but would it help if say, people were queuing SoC/board specific patches in trees and submit pull requests? Would that help lower the amount of patches to review? Any other suggestion? Thanks! -- Florian