From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Mon, 22 Aug 2011 19:32:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:55239 "EHLO lo.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S1493420Ab1HVRcZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Aug 2011 19:32:25 +0200 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QvYMK-000144-8u for linux-mips@linux-mips.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2011 19:32:24 +0200 Received: from 91-64-80-26-dynip.superkabel.de ([91.64.80.26]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2011 19:32:24 +0200 Received: from zecke by 91-64-80-26-dynip.superkabel.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2011 19:32:24 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: linux-mips@linux-mips.org From: Holger Freyther Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Implement =?utf-8?b?cGVyZl9jYWxsY2hhaW5fdXNlcg==?= Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 17:32:12 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <1313022966-28152-1-git-send-email-zecke@selfish.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 91.64.80.26 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Ubuntu/11.04 Chromium/12.0.742.112 Chrome/12.0.742.112 Safari/534.30) X-archive-position: 30946 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: zecke@selfish.org Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips Return-Path: X-Keywords: X-UID: 16087 Holger Hans Peter Freyther selfish.org> writes: > > Hi, > this is moving code from oprofile/backtrace.c to a commom > place and then implements perf_callchain_user using the common > code. Right now the unwind_user_frame will always be compiled > into the kernel. Comments? Should this go somewhere else?