From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) id g0VKb7X04976 for linux-mips-outgoing; Thu, 31 Jan 2002 12:37:07 -0800 Received: from office.mandrakesoft.com (office.mandrakesoft.com [195.68.114.34]) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) with SMTP id g0VKb2d04973; Thu, 31 Jan 2002 12:37:02 -0800 Received: from localhost.mandrakesoft.com ([192.168.100.108]) by office.mandrakesoft.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA32235; Thu, 31 Jan 2002 20:36:40 +0100 Received: by localhost.mandrakesoft.com (Postfix, from userid 501) id D0A3D16EF7; Thu, 31 Jan 2002 20:27:19 +0100 (CET) To: Ralf Baechle Cc: Carsten Langgaard , Linux-MIPS Subject: Re: Yet another problem/bug on 20Kc Rev4.0 :-( References: <3C594485.640694F9@mips.com> <3C596440.6D038367@mips.com> <20020131201010.C2309@dea.linux-mips.net> X-Url: http://www.lfcia.org/~quintela From: Juan Quintela In-Reply-To: <20020131201010.C2309@dea.linux-mips.net> Date: 31 Jan 2002 20:27:19 +0100 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk >>>>> "ralf" == Ralf Baechle writes: ralf> On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 04:35:28PM +0100, Carsten Langgaard wrote: >> Please ignore my previous mail, it wasn't intended for this list, it was >> intended for our internal linux list. >> I'm just testing linux on one of our prototype chips, which probably has >> no interest to you. ralf> There burns the NDA ;-) We now know that MIPS is developing a new MIPS chip :ppppp Later, Juan. -- In theory, practice and theory are the same, but in practice they are different -- Larry McVoy