From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Tue, 07 Oct 2008 14:50:08 +0100 (BST) Received: from mx1.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:49640 "EHLO mx1.suse.de") by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S20831116AbYJGNuA (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Oct 2008 14:50:00 +0100 Received: from Relay2.suse.de (relay-ext.suse.de [195.135.221.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC33041892; Tue, 7 Oct 2008 15:49:57 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2008 15:49:56 +0200 Message-ID: From: Takashi Iwai To: Manuel Lauss Cc: Kevin Hickey , linux-mips , alsa-devel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2 Au1xxx (Alchemy) AC97 drivers In-Reply-To: <20081007133645.GA13668@roarinelk.homelinux.net> References: <1223386106.31477.3.camel@kh-ubuntu> <20081007133645.GA13668@roarinelk.homelinux.net> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.12.0 (Your Wildest Dreams) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.7 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Sanj=F2?=) APEL/10.6 Emacs/22.3 (x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 20699 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: tiwai@suse.de Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips At Tue, 7 Oct 2008 15:36:45 +0200, Manuel Lauss wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 08:28:26AM -0500, Kevin Hickey wrote: > > There appear to be 2 AC97 drivers for Alchemy in the latest Linux tree. > > One is in sound/mips and the other is in sound/soc. Are both going to > > be maintained going forward? If not, which one will be? > > The one in sound/soc is for Au1200/Au1550; I think the sound/mips one only > works on Au1000/Au1500. Seems so, as far as I see. And whether they will be maintained is rather a question whether we'll have users for these drivers. As long as someone uses, there is no reason to drop it. Takashi