From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Sat, 2 Dec 2000 05:03:21 -0800 Received: from orzan.fi.udc.es ([193.144.60.19]:54912 "EHLO orzan.fi.udc.es") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Sat, 2 Dec 2000 05:02:57 -0800 Received: from serpe.mitica (mail@vexeta.dc.fi.udc.es [193.144.51.32]) by orzan.fi.udc.es (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA18783; Sat, 2 Dec 2000 14:02:52 +0100 (MET) Received: from quintela by serpe.mitica with local (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian)) id 142CJX-0001jV-00; Sat, 02 Dec 2000 14:02:51 +0100 To: Florian Lohoff Cc: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] DEC init_cycle_counter References: <20001202132748.A2002@paradigm.rfc822.org> X-Url: http://carpanta.dc.fi.udc.es/~quintela From: "Juan J. Quintela" In-Reply-To: Florian Lohoff's message of "Sat, 2 Dec 2000 13:27:48 +0100" Date: 02 Dec 2000 14:02:51 +0100 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) Emacs/20.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips-outgoing >>>>> "florian" == Florian Lohoff writes: florian> Comments ? [snip] florian> -char cyclecounter_available; florian> - [snip] florian> if (cyclecounter_available) { florian> write_32bit_cp0_register(CP0_COUNT, 0); You delete the definition of cyclecounter_available and you mantain one of its uses ..... that is a no-no, I will bet that with that patch, this don't compile (and less it works .....). Later, Juan. -- In theory, practice and theory are the same, but in practice they are different -- Larry McVoy