From: "Måns Rullgård" <mans@mansr.com>
To: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@gmail.com>
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] MIPS: optimise 32-bit do_div() with constant divisor
Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2014 02:18:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yw1xtx2aigee.fsf@unicorn.mansr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <545D10DE.5000804@gmail.com> (David Daney's message of "Fri, 07 Nov 2014 10:35:10 -0800")
David Daney <ddaney.cavm@gmail.com> writes:
> On 11/07/2014 07:00 AM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> [...]
>>
>>> As for access to hi/lo, I tried to explicitly put a variable in the lo
>>> register. Which sort of works for very simple cases but as expected it's
>>> easy to get GCC to spill its RTL guts because it runs out of spill
>>> registers. It maybe can be made to work but I'd feel nervous about its
>>> stability unless a GCC guru approved this method.
>>
>> The "x" constraint can be used to move a double-word to/from the hi/lo
>> registers. On DSP targets, the "ka" constraint provides access to the
>> three additional hi/lo pairs while on a non-DSP targets it degenerates
>> to "x". The "ka" constraint is available since gcc 4.3.0. I see no
>> reason not to allow this extra flexibility.
>
> What would the performance penalty be to hand code the assembly so
> that only mips32 instructions are used (i.e. no MADD), and transfers
> from hi/lo were all explicitly coded so that there were no hi/lo
> register constraints, but only clobbers of "hi", "lo"?
It's hard to say in absolute numbers. However, the pre-mips32
equivalent of MADDU looks something like this:
multu $4, $5
mflo $6
mfhi $7
addu $8, $8, $6
addu $9, $9, $7
sltu $6, $8, $6
addu $9, $9, $6
--
Måns Rullgård
mans@mansr.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-08 2:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-06 16:23 [RFC PATCH] MIPS: optimise 32-bit do_div() with constant divisor Mans Rullgard
2014-11-06 17:08 ` David Daney
2014-11-06 17:42 ` Måns Rullgård
2014-11-07 0:50 ` Ralf Baechle
2014-11-07 2:20 ` Måns Rullgård
2014-11-07 11:35 ` Ralf Baechle
2014-11-07 15:00 ` Måns Rullgård
2014-11-07 18:35 ` David Daney
2014-11-08 2:18 ` Måns Rullgård [this message]
2015-01-11 5:05 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=yw1xtx2aigee.fsf@unicorn.mansr.com \
--to=mans@mansr.com \
--cc=ddaney.cavm@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox