From: "Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)" <vbabka@kernel.org>
To: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Clark Williams <clrkwllms@kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
Harry Yoo <harry@kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm/page_alloc: rename FPI_TRYLOCK -> FPI_NOLOCK
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2026 14:40:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0048210a-e186-49c7-9897-32c9b66336c6@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260710-spin-trylock-followup-v1-2-affb5fe5ed00@google.com>
On 7/10/26 12:42, Brendan Jackman wrote:
> As discussed in the linked patch, the there is some inconsistency between
> "trylock" and "nolock" nomenclature, let's align it. Since "nolock" is
> used in the public API it seems to have more mindshare so do that.
>
> The linked patch did this for the ALLOC_ flag but forgot about FPI_.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260703-alloc-trylock-v5-1-c87b714e19d3@google.com/
> Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Naming things is hard. Maybe it should have all been called "nospin". I
don't know anymore :)
_nolock() functions and ALLOC_NOLOCK are part of API, FPI_ is internal so
it's not that urgent. Furthermore:
> ---
> mm/page_alloc.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 5fe1c11f919d7..ba8d882072de5 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ typedef int __bitwise fpi_t;
> #define FPI_TO_TAIL ((__force fpi_t)BIT(1))
>
> /* Free the page without taking locks. Rely on trylock only. */
here's a "trylock"
> -#define FPI_TRYLOCK ((__force fpi_t)BIT(2))
> +#define FPI_NOLOCK ((__force fpi_t)BIT(2))
And here's not anymore.
>
> /* free_pages_prepare() has already been called for page(s) being freed. */
> #define FPI_PREPARED ((__force fpi_t)BIT(3))
> @@ -1419,7 +1419,7 @@ static __always_inline bool __free_pages_prepare(struct page *page,
> page_table_check_free(page, order);
> pgalloc_tag_sub(page, 1 << order);
>
> - if (!PageHighMem(page) && !(fpi_flags & FPI_TRYLOCK)) {
> + if (!PageHighMem(page) && !(fpi_flags & FPI_NOLOCK)) {
> debug_check_no_locks_freed(page_address(page),
> PAGE_SIZE << order);
> debug_check_no_obj_freed(page_address(page),
> @@ -1558,7 +1558,7 @@ static void free_one_page(struct zone *zone, struct page *page,
> struct llist_head *llhead;
> unsigned long flags;
>
> - if (unlikely(fpi_flags & FPI_TRYLOCK)) {
> + if (unlikely(fpi_flags & FPI_NOLOCK)) {
> if (!spin_trylock_irqsave(&zone->lock, flags)) {
> add_page_to_zone_llist(zone, page, order);
> return;
> @@ -1569,7 +1569,7 @@ static void free_one_page(struct zone *zone, struct page *page,
>
> /* The lock succeeded. Process deferred pages. */
> llhead = &zone->trylock_free_pages;
> - if (unlikely(!llist_empty(llhead) && !(fpi_flags & FPI_TRYLOCK))) {
> + if (unlikely(!llist_empty(llhead) && !(fpi_flags & FPI_NOLOCK))) {
> struct llist_node *llnode;
> struct page *p, *tmp;
>
> @@ -2882,7 +2882,7 @@ static bool free_frozen_page_commit(struct zone *zone,
> if (pcp->free_count < (batch << CONFIG_PCP_BATCH_SCALE_MAX))
> pcp->free_count += (1 << order);
>
> - if (unlikely(fpi_flags & FPI_TRYLOCK)) {
> + if (unlikely(fpi_flags & FPI_NOLOCK)) {
> /*
> * Do not attempt to take a zone lock. Let pcp->count get
> * over high mark temporarily.
> @@ -2979,7 +2979,7 @@ static void __free_frozen_pages(struct page *page, unsigned int order,
> migratetype = MIGRATE_MOVABLE;
> }
>
> - if (unlikely((fpi_flags & FPI_TRYLOCK) && !can_spin_trylock())) {
> + if (unlikely((fpi_flags & FPI_NOLOCK) && !can_spin_trylock())) {
can_spin_trylock() was matched with FPI_TRYLOCK, now not anymore
> add_page_to_zone_llist(zone, page, order);
> return;
> }
> @@ -3001,7 +3001,7 @@ void free_frozen_pages(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
>
> void free_frozen_pages_nolock(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
> {
> - __free_frozen_pages(page, order, FPI_TRYLOCK);
> + __free_frozen_pages(page, order, FPI_NOLOCK);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -5409,7 +5409,7 @@ struct page *__alloc_frozen_pages_noprof(gfp_t gfp, unsigned int order,
> if (memcg_kmem_online() && (gfp & __GFP_ACCOUNT) && page &&
> unlikely(__memcg_kmem_charge_page(page, gfp, order) != 0)) {
> __free_frozen_pages(page, order,
> - alloc_flags & ALLOC_NOLOCK ? FPI_TRYLOCK : 0);
> + alloc_flags & ALLOC_NOLOCK ? FPI_NOLOCK : 0);
Although here it does improve things. Sigh.
> page = NULL;
> }
>
> @@ -5532,7 +5532,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__free_pages);
> */
> void free_pages_nolock(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
> {
> - ___free_pages(page, order, FPI_TRYLOCK);
> + ___free_pages(page, order, FPI_NOLOCK);
> }
>
> /**
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-10 12:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-10 10:42 [PATCH 0/2] mm/page_alloc: couple of followups for recent cleanups Brendan Jackman
2026-07-10 10:42 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm/page_alloc: don't spin_trylock() in NMI on UP Brendan Jackman
2026-07-11 0:03 ` Andrew Morton
2026-07-10 10:42 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm/page_alloc: rename FPI_TRYLOCK -> FPI_NOLOCK Brendan Jackman
2026-07-10 12:40 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) [this message]
2026-07-10 14:14 ` Zi Yan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0048210a-e186-49c7-9897-32c9b66336c6@kernel.org \
--to=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=clrkwllms@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=harry@kernel.org \
--cc=jackmanb@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox