From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pl0-f70.google.com (mail-pl0-f70.google.com [209.85.160.70]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDC4E6B0003 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2018 14:51:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pl0-f70.google.com with SMTP id k4-v6so3690313pls.15 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2018 11:51:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-sor-f65.google.com (mail-sor-f65.google.com. [209.85.220.65]) by mx.google.com with SMTPS id p10sor1691941pfj.55.2018.03.15.11.51.20 for (Google Transport Security); Thu, 15 Mar 2018 11:51:20 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] struct page: add field for vm_struct References: <20180313214554.28521-1-igor.stoppa@huawei.com> <20180313214554.28521-5-igor.stoppa@huawei.com> <20180313220040.GA15791@bombadil.infradead.org> <7b18521c-539b-2ba1-823e-e83be071c13f@gmail.com> <6924c919-dbfb-a9f6-748a-0bbfe8d876b1@huawei.com> From: J Freyensee Message-ID: <007b20f7-54f8-0397-88ce-4a106bfdb8e9@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 11:51:16 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <6924c919-dbfb-a9f6-748a-0bbfe8d876b1@huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Igor Stoppa , Matthew Wilcox Cc: david@fromorbit.com, rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com, keescook@chromium.org, mhocko@kernel.org, labbott@redhat.com, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com On 3/15/18 2:38 AM, Igor Stoppa wrote: > On 14/03/18 19:43, J Freyensee wrote: >> On 3/13/18 3:00 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > [...] > >>>> Signed-off-by: Igor Stoppa >>> Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox >> Igor, do you mind sticking these tags on the files that have spent some >> time reviewing a revision of your patchset (like the Reviewed-by: tags I >> provided last revision?) > Apologies, that was not intentional, I forgot it. > I will do it, although most of the files will now change so much that I > am not sure what will survive, beside this patch, in the form that you > reviewed. > > I suppose the Review-by tag drops, if the patch changes. That's true, if so much of the patch changes it basically looks like something different, the Reviewed-by: would drop. Jay > > -- > igor