linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "zhangpeng (AS)" <zhangpeng362@huawei.com>
To: <linux-mm@kvack.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <dennisszhou@gmail.com>,
	<shakeelb@google.com>, <jack@suse.cz>, <surenb@google.com>,
	<kent.overstreet@linux.dev>, <mhocko@suse.cz>, <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	<yuzhao@google.com>, <yu.ma@intel.com>,
	<wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>, <sunnanyong@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] mm: convert mm's rss stats to use atomic mode
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 12:29:25 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0145f5db-1adf-46d1-1a2e-41230ab1e462@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240418142008.2775308-1-zhangpeng362@huawei.com>

On 2024/4/18 22:20, Peng Zhang wrote:

Any suggestions or opinions are welcome. Could someone please review
this patch series?
Thanks!

> From: ZhangPeng <zhangpeng362@huawei.com>
>
> Since commit f1a7941243c1 ("mm: convert mm's rss stats into
> percpu_counter"), the rss_stats have converted into percpu_counter,
> which convert the error margin from (nr_threads * 64) to approximately
> (nr_cpus ^ 2). However, the new percpu allocation in mm_init() causes a
> performance regression on fork/exec/shell. Even after commit 14ef95be6f55
> ("kernel/fork: group allocation/free of per-cpu counters for mm struct"),
> the performance of fork/exec/shell is still poor compared to previous
> kernel versions.
>
> To mitigate performance regression, we delay the allocation of percpu
> memory for rss_stats. Therefore, we convert mm's rss stats to use
> percpu_counter atomic mode. For single-thread processes, rss_stat is in
> atomic mode, which reduces the memory consumption and performance
> regression caused by using percpu. For multiple-thread processes,
> rss_stat is switched to the percpu mode to reduce the error margin.
> We convert rss_stats from atomic mode to percpu mode only when the
> second thread is created.
>
> After lmbench test, we can get 2% ~ 4% performance improvement
> for lmbench fork_proc/exec_proc/shell_proc and 6.7% performance
> improvement for lmbench page_fault (before batch mode[1]).
>
> The test results are as follows:
>               base           base+revert        base+this patch
>
> fork_proc    416.3ms        400.0ms  (3.9%)    398.6ms  (4.2%)
> exec_proc    2095.9ms       2061.1ms (1.7%)    2047.7ms (2.3%)
> shell_proc   3028.2ms       2954.7ms (2.4%)    2961.2ms (2.2%)
> page_fault   0.3603ms       0.3358ms (6.8%)    0.3361ms (6.7%)
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240412064751.119015-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com/
>
> ChangeLog:
> v2->v1:
> - Convert rss_stats from atomic mode to percpu mode only when
>    the second thread is created per Jan Kara.
> - Compared with v1, the performance data may be different due to
>    different test machines.
>
> ZhangPeng (2):
>    percpu_counter: introduce atomic mode for percpu_counter
>    mm: convert mm's rss stats to use atomic mode
>
>   include/linux/mm.h             | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>   include/linux/percpu_counter.h | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>   include/trace/events/kmem.h    |  4 +--
>   kernel/fork.c                  | 18 +++++++-----
>   lib/percpu_counter.c           | 31 +++++++++++++++++++--
>   5 files changed, 125 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
-- 
Best Regards,
Peng



  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-04-24  4:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-18 14:20 [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] mm: convert mm's rss stats to use atomic mode Peng Zhang
2024-04-18 14:20 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] percpu_counter: introduce atomic mode for percpu_counter Peng Zhang
2024-04-18 19:40   ` Andrew Morton
2024-04-19  2:55     ` zhangpeng (AS)
2024-04-26  8:11   ` Dennis Zhou
2024-04-29  7:45     ` zhangpeng (AS)
2024-04-18 14:20 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] mm: convert mm's rss stats to use atomic mode Peng Zhang
2024-04-19  2:30   ` Rongwei Wang
2024-04-19  3:32     ` zhangpeng (AS)
2024-04-20  3:13       ` Rongwei Wang
2024-04-20  8:44         ` zhangpeng (AS)
2024-05-16 11:50       ` Kairui Song
2024-05-16 15:14         ` Mateusz Guzik
2024-05-17  3:29           ` Kairui Song
2024-05-17 18:08             ` Mateusz Guzik
2024-05-19 14:13           ` Dennis Zhou
2024-04-24  4:29 ` zhangpeng (AS) [this message]
2024-04-24  4:51   ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] " Dennis Zhou

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0145f5db-1adf-46d1-1a2e-41230ab1e462@huawei.com \
    --to=zhangpeng362@huawei.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dennisszhou@gmail.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=shakeelb@google.com \
    --cc=sunnanyong@huawei.com \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=yu.ma@intel.com \
    --cc=yuzhao@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).