From: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>
To: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
kernel test robot <yi1.lai@intel.com>
Cc: oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev, lkp@intel.com,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"David Hildenbrand" <david@kernel.org>,
"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
"Lorenzo Stoakes" <ljs@kernel.org>,
"Michal Hocko" <mhocko@suse.com>,
"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
"Mike Rapoport" <rppt@kernel.org>,
"Roman Gushchin" <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
"Suren Baghdasaryan" <surenb@google.com>,
"Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>,
"Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [linux-next:master] [mm/vmpressure] ea928e9e18: stress-ng.mremap.ops_per_sec 36.2% regression
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2026 18:14:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <017721a3-5eae-449e-8b86-75cffb503dd3@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <an34C2N-yqfok2Nn@linux.dev>
On 13/08/2026 18:01, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2026 at 09:16:22PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> kernel test robot noticed a 36.2% regression of stress-ng.mremap.ops_per_sec on:
>>
>> commit: ea928e9e18da682e9a5bc40aa862bff7ce5ae42e ("mm/vmpressure: move v1 userspace eventfd code into memcontrol-v1.c") https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
>>
>> in testcase: stress-ng
>> version: stress-ng-x86_64-29ce10a2c-1_20260712
>> with following parameters:
>>
>> nr_threads: 100%
>> testtime: 60s
>> test: mremap
>> cpufreq_governor: performance
>>
>>
>>
>> config: x86_64-rhel-9.4 (CONFIG_MEMCG=y and CONFIG_MEMCG_V1 is not set)
>> compiler: gcc-14
>> test machine: 256 threads 4 sockets INTEL(R) XEON(R) PLATINUM 8592+ (Emerald Rapids) with 256G memory
>>
>> (please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire log/backtrace)
>>
>
> Hi there,
>
> Can you please test the following patch and see if it fixes the regression?
>
>
> From 84c0b05b3bc5cf73ee66ead75aafb1ad684462c3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
> Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2026 09:38:28 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] memcg: keep vmstats_percpu off the memory_events[] cacheline
>
> Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
> ---
> include/linux/memcontrol.h | 10 ++++++----
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> index e78bc98ab229..e25d5b9a1db8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> @@ -246,8 +246,13 @@ struct mem_cgroup {
> /* handle for "memory.swap.events" */
> struct cgroup_file swap_events_file;
>
> - /* memory.stat */
> + /* Read-mostly. */
> struct memcg_vmstats *vmstats;
> + struct memcg_vmstats_percpu __percpu *vmstats_percpu;
> + int kmemcg_id;
> +
> + /* Write-hot from here on; do not let it share with the above. */
> + CACHELINE_PADDING(_pad_);
>
> /* memory.events */
> atomic_long_t memory_events[MEMCG_NR_MEMORY_EVENTS];
> @@ -266,9 +271,6 @@ struct mem_cgroup {
> #if BITS_PER_LONG < 64
> seqlock_t socket_pressure_seqlock;
> #endif
> - int kmemcg_id;
> -
> - struct memcg_vmstats_percpu __percpu *vmstats_percpu;
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_WRITEBACK
> struct list_head cgwb_list;
I was currently testing this diff, not sure which one would be better.
diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
index e78bc98ab229b..215e2e87f42b2 100644
--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
+++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -268,10 +268,15 @@ struct mem_cgroup {
#endif
int kmemcg_id;
- struct memcg_vmstats_percpu __percpu *vmstats_percpu;
-
#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_WRITEBACK
struct list_head cgwb_list;
+#endif
+
+ /* Keep the hot per-CPU stats pointer away from memory event counters. */
+ struct memcg_vmstats_percpu __percpu *vmstats_percpu
+ ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_WRITEBACK
struct wb_domain cgwb_domain;
struct memcg_cgwb_frn cgwb_frn[MEMCG_CGWB_FRN_CNT];
#endif
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-13 17:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-13 13:16 [linux-next:master] [mm/vmpressure] ea928e9e18: stress-ng.mremap.ops_per_sec 36.2% regression kernel test robot
2026-08-13 17:01 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-08-13 17:14 ` Usama Arif [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=017721a3-5eae-449e-8b86-75cffb503dd3@linux.dev \
--to=usama.arif@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=yi1.lai@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox