From: "Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)" <vbabka@kernel.org>
To: "Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)" <ljs@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Tal Zussman <tz2294@columbia.edu>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/madvise: disallow guard region installation in uffd-armed VMAs
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2026 09:58:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <01b19c1e-b87d-4996-acaa-cd5103f30edb@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261112-disallow-uffd-guard-install-v1-1-bcf8b1aaa72e@kernel.org>
On 11/12/26 18:38, Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) wrote:
> In order to establish guard regions, guard markers are installed in the
> page tables of a mapped VMA.
>
> However, problems arise when one tries to combine this with registering a
> VMA for userfaultfd, as such operations may themselves need to install page
> table markers such as uffd-wp.
>
> When this installation is attempted the guard marker prevents these markers
> being applied, which can lead to unexpected results (especially if the
> guard regions are later removed.)
>
> This is especially problematic because guard region installation causes the
> regions to be zapped first, meaning that the removal of userfaultfd-tracked
> ranges will not be logged in this case.
>
> Therefore, disallow this.
>
> This makes sense as conceptually, guard regions mark a part of a VMA as
> effectively unmapped at the page table level, and removing the markers is
> like mapping the VMA again, over which operation uffd markers would in any
> case be lost.
>
> Only check for this on installation, as a VMA can be registered for
> userfaultfd after guard regions are established.
>
> In this case, the guard regions cannot have new markers installed, and no
> faults can occur in the guard regions, until they are removed, at which
> point everything should function normally.
So IIUC this means the other order of operations (first guard regions, then
uffd) already prevents the two co-existing. Makes sense to prevent the same
in the order of uffd and then guard regions then.
> A survey of open source users indicates nobody is relying on installing
> guard regions in uffd-armed VMAs. Software including glibc, android,
> tcmalloc and CRIU were checked.
>
> Fix the selftest to reflect the change.
>
> Fixes: 662df3e5c376 ("mm: madvise: implement lightweight guard page mechanism")
> Reported-by: Tal Zussman <tz2294@columbia.edu>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261111-uffd-state-fixes-v1-9-00713d368976@columbia.edu/
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261111-uffd-state-fixes-v1-10-00713d368976@columbia.edu/
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261111-uffd-state-fixes-v1-11-00713d368976@columbia.edu/
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) <ljs@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) <vbabka@kernel.org>
> ---
> mm/madvise.c | 4 ++++
> tools/testing/selftests/mm/guard-regions.c | 12 ++++++++----
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/madvise.c b/mm/madvise.c
> index 0214efd2a014..268731e90f12 100644
> --- a/mm/madvise.c
> +++ b/mm/madvise.c
> @@ -1156,6 +1156,10 @@ static long madvise_guard_install(struct madvise_behavior *madv_behavior)
> if (!is_valid_guard_vma(vma, /* allow_locked = */false))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> + /* Guard markers are incompatible with UFFD markers. */
> + if (userfaultfd_armed(vma))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> /*
> * Set atomically under read lock. All pertinent readers will need to
> * acquire an mmap/VMA write lock to read it. All remaining readers may
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/guard-regions.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/guard-regions.c
> index 02f69244f9a4..97da54dcf3a4 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/guard-regions.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/guard-regions.c
> @@ -1476,7 +1476,7 @@ TEST_F(guard_regions, cold_pageout)
> ASSERT_EQ(munmap(ptr, 10 * page_size), 0);
> }
>
> -/* Ensure that guard pages do not break userfaultd. */
> +/* Ensure that guard regions cannot be installed in uffd-armed VMAs. */
> TEST_F(guard_regions, uffd)
> {
> const unsigned long page_size = self->page_size;
> @@ -1526,10 +1526,15 @@ TEST_F(guard_regions, uffd)
> reg.mode = UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_MISSING;
> ASSERT_EQ(ioctl(uffd, UFFDIO_REGISTER, ®), 0);
>
> - /* Guard the range. This should not trigger the uffd. */
> + /* Now try to guard, should fail with EINVAL. */
> + ASSERT_EQ(madvise(ptr, 10 * page_size, MADV_GUARD_INSTALL), -1);
> + ASSERT_EQ(errno, EINVAL);
> +
> + /* Once unregistered, we should be able to guard the range. */
> + ASSERT_EQ(ioctl(uffd, UFFDIO_UNREGISTER, &range), 0);
> ASSERT_EQ(madvise(ptr, 10 * page_size, MADV_GUARD_INSTALL), 0);
>
> - /* The guarding should behave as usual with no uffd intervention. */
> + /* The guarding should behave as usual. */
> for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
> char *curr = &ptr[i * page_size];
>
> @@ -1537,7 +1542,6 @@ TEST_F(guard_regions, uffd)
> }
>
> /* Cleanup. */
> - ASSERT_EQ(ioctl(uffd, UFFDIO_UNREGISTER, &range), 0);
> close(uffd);
> ASSERT_EQ(munmap(ptr, 10 * page_size), 0);
> }
>
> ---
> base-commit: 4318887a3efa4c53d6f083ccfd7105b809a3ac65
> change-id: 20261112-disallow-uffd-guard-install-a5294129ad7b
>
> Cheers,
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-13 8:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-12 17:38 [PATCH] mm/madvise: disallow guard region installation in uffd-armed VMAs Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-11-12 20:59 ` Liam R. Howlett
2026-11-12 23:59 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-11-13 8:58 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=01b19c1e-b87d-4996-acaa-cd5103f30edb@kernel.org \
--to=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tz2294@columbia.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox