linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, chrisl@kernel.org,
	hanchuanhua@oppo.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, hughd@google.com,
	kasong@tencent.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	ryan.roberts@arm.com, surenb@google.com, v-songbaohua@oppo.com,
	willy@infradead.org, xiang@kernel.org, ying.huang@intel.com,
	yosryahmed@google.com, yuzhao@google.com, ziy@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] mm: swap: entirely map large folios found in swapcache
Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 14:05:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0226a6f7-26ac-48b0-932d-1b7201cde1d7@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240503005023.174597-7-21cnbao@gmail.com>

On 03.05.24 02:50, Barry Song wrote:
> From: Chuanhua Han <hanchuanhua@oppo.com>
> 
> When a large folio is found in the swapcache, the current implementation
> requires calling do_swap_page() nr_pages times, resulting in nr_pages
> page faults. This patch opts to map the entire large folio at once to
> minimize page faults. Additionally, redundant checks and early exits
> for ARM64 MTE restoring are removed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chuanhua Han <hanchuanhua@oppo.com>
> Co-developed-by: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@oppo.com>
> Signed-off-by: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@oppo.com>
> ---
>   mm/memory.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>   1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> index 22e7c33cc747..940fdbe69fa1 100644
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -3968,6 +3968,10 @@ vm_fault_t do_swap_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
>   	pte_t pte;
>   	vm_fault_t ret = 0;
>   	void *shadow = NULL;
> +	int nr_pages = 1;
> +	unsigned long page_idx = 0;
> +	unsigned long address = vmf->address;
> +	pte_t *ptep;
>   
>   	if (!pte_unmap_same(vmf))
>   		goto out;
> @@ -4166,6 +4170,36 @@ vm_fault_t do_swap_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
>   		goto out_nomap;
>   	}
>   
> +	ptep = vmf->pte;
> +	if (folio_test_large(folio) && folio_test_swapcache(folio)) {
> +		int nr = folio_nr_pages(folio);
> +		unsigned long idx = folio_page_idx(folio, page);
> +		unsigned long folio_start = vmf->address - idx * PAGE_SIZE;
> +		unsigned long folio_end = folio_start + nr * PAGE_SIZE;
> +		pte_t *folio_ptep;
> +		pte_t folio_pte;
> +
> +		if (unlikely(folio_start < max(vmf->address & PMD_MASK, vma->vm_start)))
> +			goto check_folio;
> +		if (unlikely(folio_end > pmd_addr_end(vmf->address, vma->vm_end)))
> +			goto check_folio;
> +
> +		folio_ptep = vmf->pte - idx;
> +		folio_pte = ptep_get(folio_ptep);
> +		if (!pte_same(folio_pte, pte_move_swp_offset(vmf->orig_pte, -idx)) ||
> +		    swap_pte_batch(folio_ptep, nr, folio_pte) != nr)
> +			goto check_folio;
> +
> +		page_idx = idx;
> +		address = folio_start;
> +		ptep = folio_ptep;
> +		nr_pages = nr;
> +		entry = folio->swap;
> +		page = &folio->page;
> +	}
> +
> +check_folio:
> +
>   	/*
>   	 * PG_anon_exclusive reuses PG_mappedtodisk for anon pages. A swap pte
>   	 * must never point at an anonymous page in the swapcache that is
> @@ -4225,12 +4259,13 @@ vm_fault_t do_swap_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
>   	 * We're already holding a reference on the page but haven't mapped it
>   	 * yet.
>   	 */
> -	swap_free_nr(entry, 1);
> +	swap_free_nr(entry, nr_pages);
>   	if (should_try_to_free_swap(folio, vma, vmf->flags))
>   		folio_free_swap(folio);
>   
> -	inc_mm_counter(vma->vm_mm, MM_ANONPAGES);
> -	dec_mm_counter(vma->vm_mm, MM_SWAPENTS);
> +	folio_ref_add(folio, nr_pages - 1);
> +	add_mm_counter(vma->vm_mm, MM_ANONPAGES, nr_pages);
> +	add_mm_counter(vma->vm_mm, MM_SWAPENTS, -nr_pages);
>   	pte = mk_pte(page, vma->vm_page_prot);
>   
>   	/*
> @@ -4240,34 +4275,35 @@ vm_fault_t do_swap_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
>   	 * exclusivity.
>   	 */
>   	if (!folio_test_ksm(folio) &&
> -	    (exclusive || folio_ref_count(folio) == 1)) {
> +	    (exclusive || (folio_ref_count(folio) == nr_pages &&
> +			   folio_nr_pages(folio) == nr_pages))) {
>   		if (vmf->flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE) {
>   			pte = maybe_mkwrite(pte_mkdirty(pte), vma);
>   			vmf->flags &= ~FAULT_FLAG_WRITE;

I fail to convince myself that this change is correct, and if it is 
correct, it's confusing (I think there is a dependency on 
folio_free_swap() having been called and succeeding, such that we don't 
have a folio that is in the swapcache at this point).

Why can't we move the folio_ref_add() after this check and just leave 
the check as it is?

"folio_ref_count(folio) == 1" is as clear as it gets: we hold the single 
reference, so we can do with this thing whatever we want: it's certainly 
exclusive. No swapcache, no other people mapping it.


-- 
Cheers,

David / dhildenb



  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-05-06 12:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-03  0:50 [PATCH v3 0/6] large folios swap-in: handle refault cases first Barry Song
2024-05-03  0:50 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] mm: swap: introduce swap_free_nr() for batched swap_free() Barry Song
2024-05-03  9:26   ` Ryan Roberts
2024-05-03 20:25   ` Chris Li
2024-05-08  7:35   ` Huang, Ying
2024-05-03  0:50 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] mm: remove swap_free() and always use swap_free_nr() Barry Song
2024-05-03  9:31   ` Ryan Roberts
2024-05-03 20:37     ` Chris Li
2024-05-04  4:03       ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-05-04  4:27         ` Barry Song
2024-05-04  4:28           ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-05-04  4:47             ` Barry Song
2024-05-08  7:56     ` Huang, Ying
2024-05-08  8:30       ` Barry Song
2024-05-08  9:10         ` Ryan Roberts
2024-05-03  0:50 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] mm: introduce pte_move_swp_offset() helper which can move offset bidirectionally Barry Song
2024-05-03  9:41   ` Ryan Roberts
2024-05-03 23:40     ` Barry Song
2024-05-06  8:06       ` David Hildenbrand
2024-05-06  8:20         ` Barry Song
2024-05-06  8:31           ` David Hildenbrand
2024-05-07  8:14             ` Ryan Roberts
2024-05-07  8:24               ` Barry Song
2024-05-07  9:39                 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-05-03 20:51   ` Chris Li
2024-05-03 23:07     ` Barry Song
2024-05-08  8:08   ` Huang, Ying
2024-05-03  0:50 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] mm: introduce arch_do_swap_page_nr() which allows restore metadata for nr pages Barry Song
2024-05-03 10:02   ` Ryan Roberts
2024-05-06 16:51   ` Khalid Aziz
2024-05-03  0:50 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] mm: swap: make should_try_to_free_swap() support large-folio Barry Song
2024-05-03  0:50 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] mm: swap: entirely map large folios found in swapcache Barry Song
2024-05-03 10:50   ` Ryan Roberts
2024-05-03 23:23     ` Barry Song
2024-05-06 12:07       ` David Hildenbrand
2024-05-06 12:38         ` Barry Song
2024-05-06 12:58           ` Barry Song
2024-05-06 13:16             ` David Hildenbrand
2024-05-06 22:58               ` Barry Song
2024-05-07  8:24                 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-05-07  8:43                   ` Barry Song
2024-05-07  8:59                     ` David Hildenbrand
2024-05-07  9:24                       ` Barry Song
2024-05-07 10:39                         ` David Hildenbrand
2024-05-07 10:48                           ` Barry Song
2024-05-07  8:17       ` Ryan Roberts
2024-05-06 12:05   ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2024-05-06 12:27     ` Barry Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0226a6f7-26ac-48b0-932d-1b7201cde1d7@redhat.com \
    --to=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=21cnbao@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=chrisl@kernel.org \
    --cc=hanchuanhua@oppo.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=kasong@tencent.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=v-songbaohua@oppo.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=xiang@kernel.org \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=yosryahmed@google.com \
    --cc=yuzhao@google.com \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).