From: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
"kernel@collabora.com" <kernel@collabora.com>
Subject: Re: [Test Failure Report] exec: Test failures in execveat
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 13:49:50 +0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0459b58d-972e-42cf-8516-befc39fbe97c@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202403132004.84C9C50A5@keescook>
On 3/14/24 8:05 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 10:08:36PM +0500, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
>> On 3/8/24 1:39 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 02:22:27PM +0500, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
>>>> I've tested this patch. Still getting same failures.
>>>
>>> Okay, thanks for testing!
>>>
>>> What environment are you testing under? It would seem like some unexpected
>>> userspace conditions exist that the test isn't prepared for. (I was able
>>> to reproduce one error with /bin/dash, for example, but not the others,
>>> so something must be different in the set up.)
>> I'm testing on Debian Bookworm with v6.1, v6.7 and next-20240304 kernels.
>> I've tested it on another VM which is also Debian Bookworm. The default
>> shell is dash on Debian as well.
>
> Do you know which kernel version this _passes_ on? I haven't been able
> to find when this actually returned the expected values...
I'd tried to find a kernel on which it used to pass i.e., I rewinded the
kernel to the last change in this test. But still it was failing on that.
Not sure if the test is wrong or the environment is making the test to
output wrong values.
>
--
BR,
Muhammad Usama Anjum
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-14 8:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-05 14:20 [Test Failure Report] exec: Test failures in execveat Muhammad Usama Anjum
2024-03-05 21:00 ` Kees Cook
2024-03-07 9:22 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2024-03-07 20:39 ` Kees Cook
2024-03-11 17:08 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2024-03-13 5:23 ` Kees Cook
2024-03-14 3:05 ` Kees Cook
2024-03-14 8:49 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-03-19 11:17 Khannanov Lenar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0459b58d-972e-42cf-8516-befc39fbe97c@collabora.com \
--to=usama.anjum@collabora.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel@collabora.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).