Re: [patch] mm, oom: avoid attempting to kill init sharing same memory

Re: [patch] mm, oom: avoid attempting to kill init sharing same memory

[Hillf Danton]

> 
> From: Chen Jie <chenjie6@huawei.com>
> 
> It's possible that an oom killed victim shares an ->mm with the init
> process and thus oom_kill_process() would end up trying to kill init as
> well.
> 
> This has been shown in practice:
> 
> 	Out of memory: Kill process 9134 (init) score 3 or sacrifice child
> 	Killed process 9134 (init) total-vm:1868kB, anon-rss:84kB, file-rss:572kB
> 	Kill process 1 (init) sharing same memory
> 	...
> 	Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! exitcode=0x00000009
> 
> And this will result in a kernel panic.
> 
> If a process is forked by init and selected for oom kill while still
> sharing init_mm, then it's likely this system is in a recoverable state.
> However, it's better not to try to kill init and allow the machine to
> panic due to unkillable processes.
> 
> [rientjes@google.com: rewrote changelog]
> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Jie <chenjie6@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
> ---

Acked-by: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com>

>  I removed stable from this patch since the alternative would most likely
>  be to panic the system for no killable processes anyway.  There's a very
>  small likelihood this patch would allow for a recoverable system.
> 
>  mm/oom_kill.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
> --- a/mm/oom_kill.c
> +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
> @@ -608,6 +608,8 @@ void oom_kill_process(struct oom_control *oc, struct task_struct *p,
>  			continue;
>  		if (unlikely(p->flags & PF_KTHREAD))
>  			continue;
> +		if (!is_global_init(p))
> +			continue;
>  		if (p->signal->oom_score_adj == OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MIN)
>  			continue;
> 
> --


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

[patch] mm, oom: avoid attempting to kill init sharing same memory

[David Rientjes]

From: Chen Jie <chenjie6@huawei.com>

It's possible that an oom killed victim shares an ->mm with the init
process and thus oom_kill_process() would end up trying to kill init as
well.

This has been shown in practice:

	Out of memory: Kill process 9134 (init) score 3 or sacrifice child
	Killed process 9134 (init) total-vm:1868kB, anon-rss:84kB, file-rss:572kB
	Kill process 1 (init) sharing same memory
	...
	Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! exitcode=0x00000009

And this will result in a kernel panic.

If a process is forked by init and selected for oom kill while still
sharing init_mm, then it's likely this system is in a recoverable state.
However, it's better not to try to kill init and allow the machine to
panic due to unkillable processes.

[rientjes@google.com: rewrote changelog]
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Jie <chenjie6@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
---
 I removed stable from this patch since the alternative would most likely
 be to panic the system for no killable processes anyway.  There's a very
 small likelihood this patch would allow for a recoverable system.

 mm/oom_kill.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -608,6 +608,8 @@ void oom_kill_process(struct oom_control *oc, struct task_struct *p,
 			continue;
 		if (unlikely(p->flags & PF_KTHREAD))
 			continue;
+		if (!is_global_init(p))
+			continue;
 		if (p->signal->oom_score_adj == OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MIN)
 			continue;
 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: [patch] mm, oom: avoid attempting to kill init sharing same memory

[Michal Hocko]

On Wed 02-12-15 15:10:28, David Rientjes wrote:
> From: Chen Jie <chenjie6@huawei.com>
> 
> It's possible that an oom killed victim shares an ->mm with the init
> process and thus oom_kill_process() would end up trying to kill init as
> well.
> 
> This has been shown in practice:
> 
> 	Out of memory: Kill process 9134 (init) score 3 or sacrifice child
> 	Killed process 9134 (init) total-vm:1868kB, anon-rss:84kB, file-rss:572kB
> 	Kill process 1 (init) sharing same memory
> 	...
> 	Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! exitcode=0x00000009
> 
> And this will result in a kernel panic.
> 
> If a process is forked by init and selected for oom kill while still
> sharing init_mm, then it's likely this system is in a recoverable state.
> However, it's better not to try to kill init and allow the machine to
> panic due to unkillable processes.
> 
> [rientjes@google.com: rewrote changelog]
> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Jie <chenjie6@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
> ---
>  I removed stable from this patch since the alternative would most likely
>  be to panic the system for no killable processes anyway.  There's a very
>  small likelihood this patch would allow for a recoverable system.

Agreed.

>  mm/oom_kill.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
> --- a/mm/oom_kill.c
> +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
> @@ -608,6 +608,8 @@ void oom_kill_process(struct oom_control *oc, struct task_struct *p,
>  			continue;
>  		if (unlikely(p->flags & PF_KTHREAD))
>  			continue;
> +		if (!is_global_init(p))
> +			continue;
>  		if (p->signal->oom_score_adj == OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MIN)
>  			continue;
>  

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>